» Articles » PMID: 34578772

3D Printed Multi-Functional Scaffolds Based on Poly(ε-Caprolactone) and Hydroxyapatite Composites

Overview
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34578772
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

3D Printed biodegradable polymeric scaffolds are critical to repair a bone defect, which can provide the individual porous and network microenvironments for cell attachment and bone tissue regeneration. Biodegradable PCL/HA composites were prepared with the blending of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HA). Subsequently, the PCL/HA scaffolds were produced by the melting deposition-forming method using PCL/HA composites as the raw materials in this work. Through a serial of in vitro assessments, it was found that the PCL/HA composites possessed good biodegradability, low cell cytotoxicity, and good biocompatibility, which can improve the cell proliferation of osteoblast cells MC3T3-E1. Meanwhile, in vivo experiments were carried out for the rats with skull defects and rabbits with bone defects. It was observed that the PCL/HA scaffolds allowed the adhesion and penetration of bone cells, which enabled the growth of bone cells and bone tissue regeneration. With a composite design to load an anticancer drug (doxorubicin, DOX) and achieve sustained drug release performance, the multifunctional 3D printed PCL/HA/DOX scaffolds can enhance bone repair and be expected to inhibit probably the tumor cells after malignant bone tumor resection. Therefore, this work signifies that PCL/HA composites can be used as the potential biodegradable scaffolds for bone repairing.

Citing Articles

Unlocking the Future of Periodontal Regeneration: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Tissue Engineering and Advanced Therapeutics.

Huang T, Chen J, Suo W, Shao W, Huang C, Li M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38791052 PMC: 11118048. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051090.


First Clinical Case of Ilizarov Femur Lengthening over a Bioactive and Degradable Intramedullary Implant.

Popkov A, Tverdokhlebov S, Muradisinov S, Popkov D Case Rep Orthop. 2023; 2023:7547590.

PMID: 38099082 PMC: 10721347. DOI: 10.1155/2023/7547590.


Combined Effects of HA Concentration and Unit Cell Geometry on the Biomechanical Behavior of PCL/HA Scaffold for Tissue Engineering Applications Produced by LPBF.

Gatto M, Furlani M, Giuliani A, Cabibbo M, Bloise N, Fassina L Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(14).

PMID: 37512225 PMC: 10381722. DOI: 10.3390/ma16144950.


The Dual Effect of 3D-Printed Biological Scaffolds Composed of Diverse Biomaterials in the Treatment of Bone Tumors.

Ma Y, Zhang B, Sun H, Liu D, Zhu Y, Zhu Q Int J Nanomedicine. 2023; 18:293-305.

PMID: 36683596 PMC: 9851059. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S390500.


3D-Printed scaffolds based on poly(Trimethylene carbonate), poly(ε-Caprolactone), and β-Tricalcium phosphate.

Zheng S, Liu Z, Kang H, Liu F, Yan G, Li F Int J Bioprint. 2023; 9(1):641.

PMID: 36636134 PMC: 9831063. DOI: 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.641.


References
1.
Hu B, Du H, Yan G, Zhuo R, Wu Y, Fan C . Magnetic polycarbonate microspheres for tumor-targeted delivery of tumor necrosis factor. Drug Deliv. 2013; 21(3):204-12. DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2013.843609. View

2.
Jang J, Park J, Gao G, Cho D . Biomaterials-based 3D cell printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics. Biomaterials. 2017; 156:88-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.030. View

3.
Guney A, Malda J, Dhert W, Grijpma D . Triblock copolymers based on ε-caprolactone and trimethylene carbonate for the 3D printing of tissue engineering scaffolds. Int J Artif Organs. 2017; 40(4):176-184. DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000543. View

4.
Xia Y, Zhou P, Cheng X, Xie Y, Liang C, Li C . Selective laser sintering fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013; 8:4197-213. PMC: 3818022. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S50685. View

5.
Daly A, Pitacco P, Nulty J, Cunniffe G, Kelly D . 3D printed microchannel networks to direct vascularisation during endochondral bone repair. Biomaterials. 2018; 162:34-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.057. View