» Articles » PMID: 34577825

Is Non-Stimulated C-Peptide at Diagnosis a Good Predictive Value for Insulin Use at Two Years After Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetic Patients?

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34577825
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Insulin treatment may be initially required to stabilize patients presenting with metabolic crisis at type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) onset. Some patients with type 2 DM may need persistent insulin treatment. This study aimed to examine the predictive performance of non-stimulated C-peptide level at the time of diagnosis for future insulin use in pediatric diabetic patients. : We reviewed the medical charts of diabetic patients aged 18 years or younger in a medical center in southern Taiwan from January 2000 to December 2019. Clinical and individual data were collected at the time of DM diagnosis. Outcomes were persistent insulin use at the time of diagnosis, as well as at one and two years after diagnosis. : The final analysis included a total of 250 patients. The best cut-off point of non-stimulated C-peptide was 0.95 ng/mL, and the predictive indices for the insulin use were 0.84 for sensitivity and 0.94 for specificity at two years after DM diagnosis. Incorporating age at onset and presence of GAD antibodies can further increase the predictive power of non-stimulated C-peptide. : The value of non-stimulated C-peptide at diabetic onset was feasible and effective for predicting future insulin treatment up to the time point of two years after diagnosis.

References
1.
Xu H, Verre M . Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Children. Am Fam Physician. 2018; 98(9):590-594. View

2.
Sharma A, Xin Y, Chen X, Sood B . Early prediction of moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely premature infants. Pediatr Neonatol. 2020; 61(3):290-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.12.001. View

3.
Atkinson M, Maclaren N . The pathogenesis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331(21):1428-36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199411243312107. View

4.
Koskinen P, Viikari J, Irjala K, Kaihola H, Seppala P . C-peptide determination in the choice of treatment in diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1985; 45(7):589-97. DOI: 10.3109/00365518509155265. View

5.
Madsbad S, Krarup T, McNair P, Christiansen C, Faber O, TRANSBOL I . Practical clinical value of the C-peptide response to glucagon stimulation in the choice of treatment in diabetes mellitus. Acta Med Scand. 1981; 210(3):153-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1981.tb09793.x. View