» Articles » PMID: 34572671

A Combined Phenotypic-Genotypic Predictive Algorithm for In Vitro Detection of Bicarbonate: β-Lactam Sensitization Among Methicillin-Resistant (MRSA)

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34572671
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is routinely used to establish predictive antibiotic resistance metrics to guide the treatment of bacterial pathogens. Recently, a novel phenotype termed "bicarbonate (NaHCO)-responsiveness" was identified in a relatively high frequency of clinical MRSA strains, wherein isolates demonstrate in vitro "susceptibility" to standard β-lactams (oxacillin [OXA]; cefazolin [CFZ]) in the presence of NaHCO, and in vivo susceptibility to these β-lactams in experimental endocarditis models. We investigated whether a targeted phenotypic-genotypic screening of MRSA could rule in or rule out NaHCO susceptibility upfront. We studied 30 well-characterized clinical MRSA bloodstream isolates, including 15 MIC-susceptible to CFZ and OXA in NaHCO-supplemented Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHB); and 15 MIC-resistant to both β-lactams in this media. Using a two-tiered strategy, isolates were first screened by standard disk diffusion for susceptibility to a combination of amoxicillin-clavulanate [AMC]. Isolates then underwent genomic sequence typing: MLST (clonal complex [CC]); ; SCC; and promoter and coding region. The combination of AMC disk susceptibility testing plus and genotyping was able to predict MRSA strains that were more or less likely to be NaHCO-responsive in vitro, with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. Validation of this screening algorithm was performed in six strains from the overall cohort using an ex vivo model of endocarditis. This ex vivo model recapitulated the in vitro predictions of NaHCO-responsiveness vs. nonresponsiveness above in five of the six strains.

Citing Articles

Prophage ϕSA169 Enhances Vancomycin Persistence in Methicillin-Resistant (MRSA).

Li Y, Berti A, Abdelhady W, Xiong Y Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001434 PMC: 11852059. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14020191.


Bicarbonate Within: A Hidden Modulator of Antibiotic Susceptibility.

Ersoy S, Rose W, Proctor R Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39858381 PMC: 11760860. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14010096.


Genomic investigation and clinical correlates of the β-lactam: NaHCO responsiveness phenotype among methicillin-resistant isolates from a randomized clinical trial.

Petersiel N, Giulieri S, Daniel D, Fan S, Ersoy S, Davis J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024; 68(7):e0021824.

PMID: 38837393 PMC: 11232399. DOI: 10.1128/aac.00218-24.


Sensitizing methicillin-resistant (MRSA) to cefuroxime: the synergic effect of bicarbonate and the wall teichoic acid inhibitor ticlopidine.

Ersoy S, Proctor R, Rose W, Abdelhady W, Fan S, Madrigal S Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024; 68(3):e0162723.

PMID: 38349162 PMC: 10916381. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01627-23.


Editorial for the Special Issue: "Current Technique for Antibiotic Susceptibility Test: Advantages and Limitations; Need for Next-Generation Test".

Nicolai E Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37107112 PMC: 10135190. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040750.


References
1.
Cho H, Yang J, Cunningham S, Greenwood-Quaintance K, Dalton M, Collura C . Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible in infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020; 41(12):1402-1408. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.355. View

2.
Cunningham S, Chia N, Jeraldo P, Quest D, Johnson J, Boxrud D . Comparison of Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods for Analysis of Three Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol. 2017; 55(6):1946-1953. PMC: 5442552. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00029-17. View

3.
Gould I, Reilly J, Bunyan D, Walker A . Costs of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its control. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010; 16(12):1721-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03365.x. View

4.
Nizet V . The Accidental Orthodoxy of Drs. Mueller and Hinton. EBioMedicine. 2017; 22:26-27. PMC: 5552209. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.07.002. View

5.
Rose W, Leonard S, Rybak M . Evaluation of daptomycin pharmacodynamics and resistance at various dosage regimens against Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibilities to daptomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 52(9):3061-7. PMC: 2533470. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00102-08. View