» Articles » PMID: 34572603

Cyclophilins and Their Functions in Abiotic Stress and Plant-Microbe Interactions

Overview
Journal Biomolecules
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34572603
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plants have developed a variety of mechanisms and regulatory pathways to change their gene expression profiles in response to abiotic stress conditions and plant-microbe interactions. The plant-microbe interaction can be pathogenic or beneficial. Stress conditions, both abiotic and pathogenic, negatively affect the growth, development, yield and quality of plants, which is very important for crops. In contrast, the plant-microbe interaction could be growth-promoting. One of the proteins involved in plant response to stress conditions and plant-microbe interactions is cyclophilin. Cyclophilins (CyPs), together with FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs) and parvulins, belong to a big family of proteins with peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity (Enzyme Commission (EC) number 5.2.1.8). Genes coding for proteins with the CyP domain are widely expressed in all organisms examined, including bacteria, fungi, animals, and plants. Their different forms can be found in the cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, nucleus, chloroplast, mitochondrion and in the phloem space. They are involved in numerous processes, such as protein folding, cellular signaling, mRNA processing, protein degradation and apoptosis. In the past few years, many new functions, and molecular mechanisms for cyclophilins have been discovered. In this review, we aim to summarize recent advances in cyclophilin research to improve our understanding of their biological functions in plant defense and symbiotic plant-microbe interactions.

Citing Articles

Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the Cucumber FKBP Gene Family in Response to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses.

Yang D, Li Y, Zhu M, Cui R, Gao J, Shu Y Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(11).

PMID: 38002948 PMC: 10671320. DOI: 10.3390/genes14112006.


Drought stress tolerance mechanisms and their potential common indicators to salinity, insights from the wild watermelon A review.

Malambane G, Madumane K, Sewelo L, Batlang U Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1074395.

PMID: 36815012 PMC: 9939662. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1074395.


Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of FKBP Gene Family in Wheat ().

Ge Q, Peng P, Cheng M, Meng Y, Cao Y, Zhang S Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(23).

PMID: 36498828 PMC: 9739119. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232314501.


The emerging importance of immunophilins in fibrosis development.

Alqudah A, Abudalo R, Qnais E, Wedyan M, Oqal M, McClements L Mol Cell Biochem. 2022; 478(6):1281-1291.

PMID: 36302992 PMC: 10164022. DOI: 10.1007/s11010-022-04591-1.


Genome-wide characterization and identification of cyclophilin genes associated with leaf rust resistance in bread wheat ( L.).

Tyagi S, Jha S, Kumar A, Saripalli G, Bhurta R, Hurali D Front Genet. 2022; 13:972474.

PMID: 36246582 PMC: 9561851. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.972474.


References
1.
Handschumacher R, Harding M, Rice J, Drugge R, Speicher D . Cyclophilin: a specific cytosolic binding protein for cyclosporin A. Science. 1984; 226(4674):544-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.6238408. View

2.
Cheng H, BOVEY F . Cis-trans equilibrium and kinetic studies of acetyl-L-proline and glycyl-L-proline. Biopolymers. 1977; 16(7):1465-72. DOI: 10.1002/bip.1977.360160707. View

3.
Yang H, Xu L, Cui H, Zhong B, Liu G, Shi H . Low nitrogen-induced expression of cyclophilin in Nicotiana tabacum. J Plant Res. 2012; 126(1):121-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-012-0499-1. View

4.
Mudgett M, Staskawicz B . Characterization of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato AvrRpt2 protein: demonstration of secretion and processing during bacterial pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol. 1999; 32(5):927-41. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01403.x. View

5.
Figueroa J, Hayman M . Differential effects of the Ski-interacting protein (SKIP) on differentiation induced by transforming growth factor-beta1 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in C2C12 cells. Exp Cell Res. 2004; 296(2):163-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.01.025. View