» Articles » PMID: 34571604

Subjective and Objective Assessment of the Eye Drop Instillation Technique: A Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34571604
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To objectively and subjectively evaluate eye drop technique and assess communicated instructions, and reported problems with eye drop instillation among tertiary care sample eye drop users.

Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was carried out among patients attending our outpatient clinic from June to September 2020. Eligible participants obtained through convenient sampling were assessed for their eye drop instillation performance. The objective evaluation was made using observation of a demonstration and subjective assessment through responses to an interview. Patient inclusion criteria were being aged ≥18 years and using eye drops for ≥ one month; excluded if having a disability in communication or physical barriers in using eye drops. The patient reported difficulties and previous education about the instillation were also obtained.

Results: Participants (n = 84) had a mean age of 50.3 ± 14.0 years. During the demonstration, almost everyone (86.9%) successfully instilled at least one drop in the eye. None of the participants exhibited a perfect drop technique. The most common deviations were failing to close the eye (60.7%), touching the bottle to the eye or eyelid (36.9% of patients), and multiple blinks after drop instillation without nasolacrimal occlusion (25.0%). Forty percent of patients reported ≥1 problem and only a small sample recalled having had education in the eye drop instillation technique.

Conclusion: Most participants failed to properly execute the eye drop technique. A proactive role of the prescribing practitioner to assess a patient's ability to instill eye drops correctly could be helpful.

Citing Articles

Development of a conjunctival contact-type drug delivery device for latanoprost using hyaluronic acid.

Lee S, Jung M, Park C Drug Deliv. 2025; 32(1):2459775.

PMID: 39902753 PMC: 11795754. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2025.2459775.


Evaluating and Managing the Microbial Contamination of Eye Drops: A Two-Phase Hospital-Based Study.

Roquefeuil L, Iskandar K, Roques C, Marchin L, Guittard M, Poupet H Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 39065630 PMC: 11279954. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16070933.


Early Real-World Patient and Staff Experience with an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert.

Nijm L, Matossian C, Rhee M, Stephens J, Rosselson M, Majmudar P Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1391-1401.

PMID: 38784434 PMC: 11114144. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S448973.


Estimation of Topical Glaucoma Medication Over-Prescription and Its Associated Factors.

Takao E, Ichitani A, Tanito M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202191 PMC: 10779581. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010184.


Alternatives to Topical Glaucoma Medication for Glaucoma Management.

Bedrood S, Berdahl J, Sheybani A, Singh I Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:3899-3913.

PMID: 38111854 PMC: 10726774. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S439457.


References
1.
Khandekar R, Shama M, Mohammed A . Noncompliance with medical treatment among glaucoma patients in Oman--a cross-sectional descriptive study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005; 12(5):303-9. DOI: 10.1080/09286580500224602. View

2.
Tsai T, Robin A, Smith 3rd J . An evaluation of how glaucoma patients use topical medications: a pilot study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 105:29-33. PMC: 2258098. View

3.
Olthoff C, Schouten J, van de Borne B, Webers C . Noncompliance with ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension an evidence-based review. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112(6):953-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.035. View

4.
Mcveigh K, Vakros G . The eye drop chart: a pilot study for improving administration of and compliance with topical treatments in glaucoma patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9:813-9. PMC: 4427603. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S82909. View

5.
Sanchis J, Gich I, Pedersen S . Systematic Review of Errors in Inhaler Use: Has Patient Technique Improved Over Time?. Chest. 2016; 150(2):394-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.041. View