» Articles » PMID: 34564470

Rejection Capacity of Nanofiltration Membranes for Nickel, Copper, Silver and Palladium at Various Oxidation States

Overview
Date 2021 Sep 26
PMID 34564470
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electroplating and metalworking industries produce enormous amounts of waste containing heavy metals in their effluents, leading to potential threats to biotic and abiotic life. According to regulation, heavy metal contamination must be kept within the regulated standard of a few parts per million, which has led to a recent pique in interest in the utilization of nanofiltration technology for metal recovery. The effect of feed pH, pressure, metal concentration, and oxidation of metal on the rejection of heavy metal ions using three commercial nanofiltration membranes (NF, NF90, and NF270) were explored. To begin, studies of electrolyte salts, contact angle, and water permeability were employed to characterize the nanofiltration membranes. A dead-end module was used to test the permeation and retention capacities of the nanofiltration membranes. The results showed an increase in salt rejection for all metals examined irrespective of the membrane, at a pH below the isoelectric point. For divalent cations, the NF90 membrane achieved recovery capacities of 97% and 85% at 200 ppm and 20 ppm respectively, as compared to the recovery observed for Ni, Cu, and Pd ions by NF and NF270. At a pH 2, 20 ppm and 5 bar, the NF90 membrane had the highest percent recovery, but at a pH 3, the recovery was at 95%. Mono and divalent stable Ag+ and Ni ions showed a comparatively high percent recovery as compared to Pd and Cu, which have high molecular weight and charge effect. In the presence of chelating agents, the membrane surface area is increased, resulting in high divalent ion recovery capacities due to favourable interaction with the polyamide functional group of the membranes. This study establishes the significance of oxidation in high removal efficiency cation in varying experimental conditions.

Citing Articles

Research Progress on Metal Ion Recovery Based on Membrane Technology and Adsorption Synergy.

Feng Y, Wang R Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(14).

PMID: 39063854 PMC: 11278649. DOI: 10.3390/ma17143562.


Integrating Ultrafiltration Membranes with Flocculation and Activated Carbon Pretreatment Processes for Membrane Fouling Mitigation and Metal Ion Removal from Wastewater.

Matebese F, Moutloali R ACS Omega. 2023; 8(10):9074-9085.

PMID: 36936310 PMC: 10018693. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03524.


Simulation Study of Chain-like Body Translocation through Conical Pores in Thick Membranes.

Domanski Z, Grzybowski A Membranes (Basel). 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35207060 PMC: 8878698. DOI: 10.3390/membranes12020138.

References
1.
Heidmann I, Calmano W . Removal of Zn(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Ag(I) and Cr(VI) present in aqueous solutions by aluminium electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater. 2007; 152(3):934-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.068. View

2.
Richards L, Richards B, Corry B, Schafer A . Experimental energy barriers to anions transporting through nanofiltration membranes. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(4):1968-76. DOI: 10.1021/es303925r. View

3.
Ghorbani A, Bayati B, Poerio T, Argurio P, Kikhavani T, Namdari M . Application of NF Polymeric Membranes for Removal of Multicomponent Heat-Stable Salts (HSS) Ions from Methyl Diethanolamine (MDEA) Solutions. Molecules. 2020; 25(21). PMC: 7660638. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25214911. View

4.
Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C . Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ Pollut. 2003; 122(3):435-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00308-1. View

5.
Nghiem L, Schafer A, Elimelech M . Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39(19):7698-705. DOI: 10.1021/es0507665. View