» Articles » PMID: 34556682

Risk Prediction of Clinical Adverse Outcomes with Machine Learning in a Cohort of Critically Ill Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Sep 24
PMID 34556682
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Critically ill patients affected by atrial fibrillation are at high risk of adverse events: however, the actual risk stratification models for haemorrhagic and thrombotic events are not validated in a critical care setting. With this paper we aimed to identify, adopting topological data analysis, the risk factors for therapeutic failure (in-hospital death or intensive care unit transfer), the in-hospital occurrence of stroke/TIA and major bleeding in a cohort of critically ill patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation admitted to a stepdown unit; to engineer newer prediction models based on machine learning in the same cohort. We selected all medical patients admitted for critical illness and a history of pre-existing atrial fibrillation in the timeframe 01/01/2002-03/08/2007. All data regarding patients' medical history, comorbidities, drugs adopted, vital parameters and outcomes (therapeutic failure, stroke/TIA and major bleeding) were acquired from electronic medical records. Risk factors for each outcome were analyzed adopting topological data analysis. Machine learning was used to generate three different predictive models. We were able to identify specific risk factors and to engineer dedicated clinical prediction models for therapeutic failure (AUC: 0.974, 95%CI: 0.934-0.975), stroke/TIA (AUC: 0.931, 95%CI: 0.896-0.940; Brier score: 0.13) and major bleeding (AUC: 0.930:0.911-0.939; Brier score: 0.09) in critically-ill patients, which were able to predict accurately their respective clinical outcomes. Topological data analysis and machine learning techniques represent a concrete viewpoint for the physician to predict the risk at the patients' level, aiding the selection of the best therapeutic strategy in critically ill patients affected by pre-existing atrial fibrillation.

Citing Articles

Predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure combined with atrial fibrillation using stacking ensemble model: an analysis of the medical information mart for intensive care IV (MIMIC-IV).

Chen P, Sun J, Chu Y, Zhao Y BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):402.

PMID: 39716262 PMC: 11667998. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02829-0.


Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Outcomes in Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Armoundas A, Narayan S, Arnett D, Spector-Bagdady K, Bennett D, Celi L Circulation. 2024; 149(14):e1028-e1050.

PMID: 38415358 PMC: 11042786. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001201.


Topological Data Analysis in Cardiovascular Signals: An Overview.

Hernandez-Lemus E, Miramontes P, Martinez-Garcia M Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(1).

PMID: 38248193 PMC: 10814033. DOI: 10.3390/e26010067.


Application of machine learning approaches in predicting clinical outcomes in older adults - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Olender R, Roy S, Nishtala P BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):561.

PMID: 37710210 PMC: 10503191. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04246-w.


Risk prediction score for clinical outcome in atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease.

Ishii M, Kaikita K, Yasuda S, Akao M, Ako J, Matoba T Open Heart. 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 37173099 PMC: 10186465. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002292.


References
1.
Cook D, Douketis J, Meade M, Guyatt G, Zytaruk N, Granton J . Venous thromboembolism and bleeding in critically ill patients with severe renal insufficiency receiving dalteparin thromboprophylaxis: prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Crit Care. 2008; 12(2):R32. PMC: 2447552. DOI: 10.1186/cc6810. View

2.
Vitali F, Serenelli M, Airaksinen J, Pavasini R, Tomaszuk-Kazberuk A, Mlodawska E . CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after cardioversion: Systematic review and individual patient pooled meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2019; 42(3):358-364. PMC: 6712331. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23147. View

3.
Hanley J, McNeil B . A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983; 148(3):839-43. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. View

4.
Cook D, Griffith L, Walter S, Guyatt G, Meade M, Heyland D . The attributable mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2001; 5(6):368-75. PMC: 83859. DOI: 10.1186/cc1071. View

5.
Rucco M, Sousa-Rodrigues D, Merelli E, Johnson J, Falsetti L, Nitti C . Neural hypernetwork approach for pulmonary embolism diagnosis. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:617. PMC: 4627406. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1554-5. View