» Articles » PMID: 34554536

Does Offspring Sex Ratio Differ Between Urban and Forest Populations of Great Tits (Parus Major)?

Overview
Journal Biol Futur
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Sep 23
PMID 34554536
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since male and female offspring may have different costs and benefits, parents may use sex ratio adjustment to increase their own fitness under different environmental conditions. Urban habitats provide poorer conditions for nestling development in many birds. Therefore, we investigated whether great tits (Parus major) produce different brood sex ratios in urban and natural habitats. We determined the sex of nestlings of 126 broods in two urban and two forest sites between 2012 and 2014 by molecular sexing. We found that brood sex ratio did not differ significantly between urban and forest habitats either at egg-laying or near fledging. Male offspring were larger than females in both habitats. This latter result suggests that male offspring may be more costly to raise than females, yet our findings suggest that urban great tits do not produce more daughters despite the unfavourable breeding conditions. This raises the possibility that other aspects of urban life, such as better post-fledging survival, might favour males and thereby compensate for the extra energetic costs of producing male offspring.

Citing Articles

Feather, But Not Plasma, Glucocorticoid Response to Artificial Light at Night Differs between Urban and Forest Blue Tit Nestlings.

Dominoni D, Teo D, Branston C, Jakhar A, Albalawi B, Evans N Integr Comp Biol. 2021; 61(3):1111-1121.

PMID: 34272860 PMC: 8490687. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icab067.

References
1.
Booksmythe I, Mautz B, Davis J, Nakagawa S, Jennions M . Facultative adjustment of the offspring sex ratio and male attractiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015; 92(1):108-134. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12220. View

2.
Burley N . Sex ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness. Science. 1981; 211(4483):721-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.211.4483.721. View

3.
Burley N . SEX-RATIO MANIPULATION IN COLOR-BANDED POPULATIONS OF ZEBRA FINCHES. Evolution. 2017; 40(6):1191-1206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05744.x. View

4.
Liker A, Szekely T . Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds. Evolution. 2005; 59(4):890-7. View

5.
Raberg L, Stjernman M, Nilsson J . Sex and environmental sensitivity in blue tit nestlings. Oecologia. 2005; 145(3):496-503. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0133-1. View