Creating SPACE to Evolve Academic Assessment
Authors
Affiliations
Universities and research institutions have to assess individuals when making decisions about hiring, promotion and tenure, but there are concerns that such assessments are overly reliant on metrics and proxy measures of research quality that overlook important factors such as academic rigor, data sharing and mentoring. These concerns have led to calls for universities and institutions to reform the methods they use to assess research and researchers. Here we present a new tool called SPACE that has been designed to help universities and institutions implement such reforms. The tool focuses on five core capabilities and can be used by universities and institutions at all stages of reform process.
"Best Paper" awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science.
Lagisz M, Rutkowska J, Aich U, Ross R, Santana M, Wang J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(7):e3002715.
PMID: 39042591 PMC: 11265724. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002715.
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture.
Blatch-Jones A, Lakin K, Thomas S F1000Res. 2024; 13:324.
PMID: 38826614 PMC: 11140362. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.147599.1.
Catalyzing communities of research rigour champions.
Brumback A, Ngiam W, Lapato D, Allison D, Daniels C, Dougherty M Brain Commun. 2024; 6(3):fcae120.
PMID: 38764774 PMC: 11099651. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae120.
Analysis of NIH K99/R00 awards and the career progression of awardees.
Woitowich N, Hengel S, Solis C, Vilgalys T, Babdor J, Tyrrell D Elife. 2024; 12.
PMID: 38240745 PMC: 10945599. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.88984.
Martin R, Nasir N, Carusi A Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 8:422.
PMID: 38173561 PMC: 10762290. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19567.1.