» Articles » PMID: 34552151

Relative Density of United States Forests Has Shifted to Higher Levels over Last Two Decades with Important Implications for Future Dynamics

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Sep 23
PMID 34552151
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tree size-density dynamics can inform key trends in forest productivity along with opportunities to increase ecosystem resiliency. Here, we employ a novel approach to estimate the relative density (RD, range 0-1) of any given forest based on its current size-density relationship compared to a hypothetical maximum using the coterminous US national forest inventory between 1999 and 2020. The analysis suggests a static forest land area in the US with less tree abundance but greatly increased timber volume and tree biomass. Coupled with these resource trends, an increase in RD was identified with 90% of US forest land now reaching a biologically-relevant threshold of canopy closure and/or self-thinning induced mortality (RD > 0.3), particularly in areas prone to future drought conditions (e.g., West Coast). Notably, the area of high RD stands (RD > 0.6) has quintupled over the past 20 years while the least stocked stands (RD < 0.3) have decreased 3%. The evidence from the coterminous US forest RD distribution suggest opportunities to increase live tree stocking in understocked stands, while using density management to address tree mortality and resilience to disturbances in increasingly dense forests.

Citing Articles

Denser forests across the USA experience more damage from insects and pathogens.

Asaro C, Koch F, Potter K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3666.

PMID: 36871063 PMC: 9985637. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30675-z.


Carbon conundrums: Do United States' current carbon market baselines represent an undesirable ecological threshold?.

DAmato A, Woodall C, Weiskittel A, Littlefield C, Murray L Glob Chang Biol. 2022; 28(13):3991-3994.

PMID: 35535696 PMC: 9322682. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16215.

References
1.
Bonan G . Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science. 2008; 320(5882):1444-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1155121. View

2.
Pugh T, Lindeskog M, Smith B, Poulter B, Arneth A, Haverd V . Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(10):4382-4387. PMC: 6410874. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810512116. View

3.
Kurz W, Dymond C, Stinson G, Rampley G, Neilson E, Carroll A . Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature. 2008; 452(7190):987-90. DOI: 10.1038/nature06777. View

4.
Lovett G, Weiss M, Liebhold A, Holmes T, Leung B, Lambert K . Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: Impacts and policy options. Ecol Appl. 2016; 26(5):1437-1455. PMC: 6680343. DOI: 10.1890/15-1176. View

5.
Xu L, Saatchi S, Yang Y, Yu Y, Pongratz J, Bloom A . Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century. Sci Adv. 2021; 7(27). PMC: 11205271. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe9829. View