» Articles » PMID: 34548829

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Sep 22
PMID 34548829
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension (HT) has a significant impact on health care worldwide. Therapeutic inertia (TI) is defined as the failure to intensify therapy in the absence of an optimal goal and is widely used as a quality of care parameter. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected many health-care systems, including HT care. Therefore, the present study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TI and its predictors in patients with HT.

Methods: The electronic medical records of patients with HT who attended a primary care clinic at a tertiary hospital during pre-COVID-19 (February 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (March to August 2020) periods were reviewed.

Results: Our study included 6089 visits during the 12-month pre-COVID-19 period and 2852 visits during the 6-month COVID-19 period. Most of the baseline characteristics of the HT patients were not significantly different between the two time periods. During the COVID-19 period, the percentage of uncontrolled HT visits decreased from 43% to 31%. Similarly, the prevalence of TI decreased from 81% to 77%. False TI was predominantly due to physicians' concerns regarding the in-clinic blood pressure measurement being inaccurate during both the periods.

Conclusion: After readjustment for the physicians 'reasons, the true TI was 64% and 60% in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 period. For adjusted physician and patient-related factors, multilevel modeling was used. Senior medical staff visits, elderly patients, prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, patients who used more than one type of anti-HT medication, and patients with systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg were all predictors of TI. The COVID-19 period, on the other hand had no effect on TI with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.01).

References
1.
Wang Y, Alexander G, Stafford R . Outpatient hypertension treatment, treatment intensification, and control in Western Europe and the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167(2):141-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.2.141. View

2.
Phillips L, Branch W, COOK C, Doyle J, Gallina D, Miller C . Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135(9):825-34. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-9-200111060-00012. View

3.
Milman T, Joundi R, Alotaibi N, Saposnik G . Clinical inertia in the pharmacological management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(25):e11121. PMC: 6025046. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011121. View

4.
Benjamin E, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt M, Callaway C, Carson A . Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019; 139(10):e56-e528. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659. View

5.
Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan N, Poulter N, Prabhakaran D . 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2020; 75(6):1334-1357. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026. View