» Articles » PMID: 34548811

Effectiveness and Safety of Favipiravir Compared to Hydroxychloroquine for Management of Covid-19: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Int J Gen Med
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Sep 22
PMID 34548811
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease due to SARS-COV-2. Patients with risk factors are vulnerable to severe morbidity and mortality. Favipiravir (FPV) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are considered possible COVID-19 treatments.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of FPV compared to HCQ in patients with COVID-19 as the standard of care approved by the national protocol there.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study on patients with COVID-19 who were administered either FPV or HCQ at King Faisal Medical Complex, Taif, Saudi Arabia, from June 2020 to August 2020.

Results: In total, 508 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were categorized into three groups by medication. Patients enrolled in this study were 244 (55.8%) on FPV, 193 (44.2%) on HCQ and 71 (13.81%) on neither medication. Patients who received FPV had higher age and greater comorbidity. Most of the patients were discharged on day 14 (n = 303, 59.6%), 26 (36.6%) in neither med, 154 (63.1%) in FPV and 123 (63.7%) in HCQ groups with significant difference between groups ( < 0.0001). Mortality rate was 8.2% (n = 20) in FPV and 7.3% (n = 14) in HCQ groups with significant difference between groups (P = 0.048). Regarding drug safety, 19.7% of patients treated with FPV vs 7.8% HCQ have adverse effects with significant difference between groups ( < 0.0001). Most of the side effects were increase ALT and AST. Meanwhile, prolonged Q-T interval was reported only in the HCQ group (2.6%). From Cox regression modeling, only mechanical ventilation due to Covid 19 was predictive for mortality (HR: 16.598, 95% CI: 7.095-38.828, P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the prediction of discharge of FPV (vs HCQ) (HR: 0.933, 95% CI: 0.729-1.195, = 0.5843), predictors of mortality were HCQ (vs FPV) (HR: 2.3, 95% CI: 0.994-5.487, = 0.0518). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed improved survival time and discharged time among patients in the HCQ versus FPV group with an insignificant difference between them ( = 0.85, = 0.06, respectively).

Conclusion: The present study concluded that FPV and HCQ showed comparable efficacy in decrease mortality and oxygen requirements. FPV likely has a more favorable safety profile regarding cardiac toxicity. A randomized clinical trial with large patient numbers is recommended to confirm the effectiveness of these drugs in COVID-19 patients.

Citing Articles

Investigation of substituent effects on the electronic structure and antiviral activity of favipiravir derivatives for Covid-19 treatment using DFT and molecular docking.

Tegegn D, Belachew H, Etefa H, Salau A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17697.

PMID: 39085399 PMC: 11291664. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68712-0.


Evaluation of the relationship of treatment and vaccination with prognosis in patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Oncu S, Korkmaz D Inflammopharmacology. 2024; 32(3):1817-1826.

PMID: 38493271 PMC: 11136715. DOI: 10.1007/s10787-024-01457-4.


Aprotinin-Drug against Respiratory Diseases.

Ivachtchenko A, Ivashchenko A, Shkil D, Ivashchenko I Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(13).

PMID: 37446350 PMC: 10342444. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241311173.


Antiviral Activity of Beebread, Bee-Collected Pollen and Artificially Fermented Follen against Influenza A Virus.

Dimitriou T, Didaras N, Barda C, Skopeliti D, Kontogianni K, Karatasou K Foods. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37238799 PMC: 10217140. DOI: 10.3390/foods12101978.


Profiles of Independent-Comorbidity Groups in Senior COVID-19 Patients Reveal Low Fatality Associated with Standard Care and Low-Dose Hydroxychloroquine over Antivirals [Letter].

Gayatri S, Arsal A, Wisudawan J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:1393-1394.

PMID: 37215750 PMC: 10199694. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S420308.


References
1.
Chen J, Liu D, Liu L, Liu P, Xu Q, Xia L . [A pilot study of hydroxychloroquine in treatment of patients with moderate COVID-19]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020; 49(2):215-219. PMC: 8800713. DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.03.03. View

2.
Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M . Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020; 30(3):269-271. PMC: 7054408. DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0. View

3.
Cai Q, Yang M, Liu D, Chen J, Shu D, Xia J . Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for COVID-19: An Open-Label Control Study. Engineering (Beijing). 2020; 6(10):1192-1198. PMC: 7185795. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.007. View

4.
Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X . Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends. 2020; 14(1):72-73. DOI: 10.5582/bst.2020.01047. View

5.
Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, Du R, Zhao J, Jin Y . Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2020; 395(10236):1569-1578. PMC: 7190303. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9. View