» Articles » PMID: 34542191

Osteoblast-Specific Wnt Secretion Is Required for Skeletal Homeostasis and Loading-Induced Bone Formation in Adult Mice

Overview
Date 2021 Sep 20
PMID 34542191
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wnt signaling is critical to many aspects of skeletal regulation, but the importance of Wnt ligands in the bone anabolic response to mechanical loading is not well established. Recent transcriptome profiling studies by our laboratory and others show that mechanical loading potently induces genes encoding Wnt ligands, including Wnt1 and Wnt7b. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that mechanical loading stimulates adult bone formation by inducing Wnt ligand expression. To test this hypothesis, we inhibited Wnt ligand secretion in adult (5 months old) mice using a systemic (drug) and a bone-targeted (conditional gene knockout) approach, and subjected them to axial tibial loading to induce lamellar bone formation. Mice treated with the Wnt secretion inhibitor WNT974 exhibited a decrease in bone formation in non-loaded bones as well as a 54% decline in the periosteal bone formation response to tibial loading. Next, osteoblast-specific Wnt secretion was inhibited by dosing 5-month-old Osx-CreERT2; Wls mice with tamoxifen. Within 1 to 2 weeks of Wls deletion, skeletal homeostasis was altered with decreased bone formation and increased resorption, and the anabolic response to loading was reduced 65% compared to control (Wls ). Together, these findings show that Wnt ligand secretion is required for adult bone homeostasis, and furthermore establish a role for osteoblast-derived Wnts in mediating the bone anabolic response to tibial loading. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Citing Articles

Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway: proteins' roles in osteoporosis and cancer diseases and the regulatory effects of natural compounds on osteoporosis.

Wang X, Qu Z, Zhao S, Luo L, Yan L Mol Med. 2024; 30(1):193.

PMID: 39468464 PMC: 11520425. DOI: 10.1186/s10020-024-00957-x.


Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and mechanisms in bone formation, homeostasis, and disease.

Hu L, Chen W, Qian A, Li Y Bone Res. 2024; 12(1):39.

PMID: 38987555 PMC: 11237130. DOI: 10.1038/s41413-024-00342-8.


The bone nonunion microenvironment: A place where osteogenesis struggles with osteoclastic capacity.

Cheng K, Gao S, Mei Y, Zhou D, Song C, Guo D Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31314.

PMID: 38813209 PMC: 11133820. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31314.


Fufang Zhenshu Tiaozhi capsule enhances bone formation and safeguards against glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis through innovative Mekk2-mediated β-catenin deubiquitination.

Hong G, Tang L, Zhou T, Xie Y, Wang J, Ge D J Bone Miner Metab. 2024; 42(5):516-528.

PMID: 38755327 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01516-4.


Toll-like receptor-2 induced inflammation causes local bone formation and activates canonical Wnt signaling.

Henning P, Kassem A, Westerlund A, Lundberg P, Engdahl C, Lionikaite V Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1383113.

PMID: 38646530 PMC: 11026618. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1383113.


References
1.
Zannit H, Brodt M, Silva M . Proliferating osteoblasts are necessary for maximal bone anabolic response to loading in mice. FASEB J. 2020; 34(9):12739-12750. PMC: 7833806. DOI: 10.1096/fj.202000614R. View

2.
Niziolek P, Warman M, Robling A . Mechanotransduction in bone tissue: The A214V and G171V mutations in Lrp5 enhance load-induced osteogenesis in a surface-selective manner. Bone. 2012; 51(3):459-65. PMC: 3784262. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.05.023. View

3.
Maupin K, Droscha C, Williams B . A Comprehensive Overview of Skeletal Phenotypes Associated with Alterations in Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Humans and Mice. Bone Res. 2015; 1(1):27-71. PMC: 4472092. DOI: 10.4248/BR201301004. View

4.
Turner C, Forwood M, Rho J, Yoshikawa T . Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 1994; 9(1):87-97. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090113. View

5.
Clevers H, Nusse R . Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012; 149(6):1192-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. View