» Articles » PMID: 34540136

Patient Perspectives of Rural Kansas Maternity Care

Overview
Journal Kans J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Sep 20
PMID 34540136
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant women in rural areas face a unique set of challenges due to geographic maldistribution of obstetric services. The perspectives of rural Kansas women were sought regarding experience of birth and satisfaction with maternity care.

Methods: Medical student research assistants facilitated discussion groups and structured interviews in rural Kansas communities distributed throughout the state with women who had an uncomplicated delivery in the last 24 months. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from clinic medical records and appointments over a two-to-three-week period. Guiding questions were used to facilitate discussion. Survey instruments were used to gather information about satisfaction with maternity care. Data for qualitative and quantitative analysis was aggregated using Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes.

Results: Fourteen groups with 47 total participants completed the survey and discussion. Participants came from large rural, small rural, and isolated areas in Kansas as described by RUCA Code Four Category Classification. Survey results indicated that satisfaction with maternity care in participants' home county was significantly higher in small rural and isolated compared to large Rural RUCAs. Qualitative analysis results showed positive experiences related to doctor characteristics, relationship with doctor, doctor's involvement with care, alternative labor options, and distance convenience. Negative experiences were related to doctor bedside manner, doctor not there until delivery, and staff related complaints.

Conclusions: Kansas women in small rural and isolated RUCA codes appeared to be more satisfied with care.

References
1.
Handler A, Raube K, Kelley M, Giachello A . Women's satisfaction with prenatal care settings: a focus group study. Birth. 1996; 23(1):31-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1996.tb00458.x. View

2.
Rayburn W, Richards M, Elwell E . Drive times to hospitals with perinatal care in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119(3):611-6. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318242b4cb. View

3.
Sutherns R . Adding women's voices to the call for sustainable rural maternity care. Can J Rural Med. 2004; 9(4):239-44. View

4.
Liu J, Bellamy G, McCormick M . Patient bypass behavior and critical access hospitals: implications for patient retention. J Rural Health. 2007; 23(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00063.x. View

5.
Seguin L, Therrien R, Champagne F, Larouche D . The components of women's satisfaction with maternity care. Birth. 1989; 16(3):109-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1989.tb00878.x. View