» Articles » PMID: 34533459

International Changes in COVID-19 Clinical Trajectories Across 315 Hospitals and 6 Countries: Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background: Many countries have experienced 2 predominant waves of COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Comparing the clinical trajectories of patients hospitalized in separate waves of the pandemic enables further understanding of the evolving epidemiology, pathophysiology, and health care dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections hospitalized in participating health care systems representing 315 hospitals across 6 countries. We compared hospitalization rates, severe COVID-19 risk, and mean laboratory values between patients hospitalized during the first and second waves of the pandemic.

Methods: Using a federated approach, each participating health care system extracted patient-level clinical data on their first and second wave cohorts and submitted aggregated data to the central site. Data quality control steps were adopted at the central site to correct for implausible values and harmonize units. Statistical analyses were performed by computing individual health care system effect sizes and synthesizing these using random effect meta-analyses to account for heterogeneity. We focused the laboratory analysis on C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, fibrinogen, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and creatinine based on their reported associations with severe COVID-19.

Results: Data were available for 79,613 patients, of which 32,467 were hospitalized in the first wave and 47,146 in the second wave. The prevalence of male patients and patients aged 50 to 69 years decreased significantly between the first and second waves. Patients hospitalized in the second wave had a 9.9% reduction in the risk of severe COVID-19 compared to patients hospitalized in the first wave (95% CI 8.5%-11.3%). Demographic subgroup analyses indicated that patients aged 26 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years; male and female patients; and black patients had significantly lower risk for severe disease in the second wave than in the first wave. At admission, the mean values of CRP were significantly lower in the second wave than in the first wave. On the seventh hospital day, the mean values of CRP, ferritin, fibrinogen, and procalcitonin were significantly lower in the second wave than in the first wave. In general, countries exhibited variable changes in laboratory testing rates from the first to the second wave. At admission, there was a significantly higher testing rate for D-dimer in France, Germany, and Spain.

Conclusions: Patients hospitalized in the second wave were at significantly lower risk for severe COVID-19. This corresponded to mean laboratory values in the second wave that were more likely to be in typical physiological ranges on the seventh hospital day compared to the first wave. Our federated approach demonstrated the feasibility and power of harmonizing heterogeneous EHR data from multiple international health care systems to rapidly conduct large-scale studies to characterize how COVID-19 clinical trajectories evolve.

Citing Articles

Neurological diagnoses in hospitalized COVID-19 patients associated with adverse outcomes: A multinational cohort study.

Hutch M, Son J, Le T, Hong C, Wang X, Shakeri Hossein Abad Z PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(4):e0000484.

PMID: 38620037 PMC: 11018281. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000484.


Seven Epidemic Waves of COVID-19 in a Hospital in Madrid: Analysis of Severity and Associated Factors.

San Martin-Lopez J, Mesa N, Bernal-Bello D, Morales-Ortega A, Rivilla M, Guerrero M Viruses. 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37766248 PMC: 10538062. DOI: 10.3390/v15091839.


A retrospective cohort analysis leveraging augmented intelligence to characterize long COVID in the electronic health record: A precision medicine framework.

Strasser Z, Dagliati A, Shakeri Hossein Abad Z, Klann J, Wagholikar K, Mesa R PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 2(7):e0000301.

PMID: 37490472 PMC: 10368277. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000301.


Potential pitfalls in the use of real-world data for studying long COVID.

Zhang H, Honerlaw J, Maripuri M, Samayamuthu M, Beaulieu-Jones B, Baig H Nat Med. 2023; 29(5):1040-1043.

PMID: 37055567 PMC: 10205658. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02274-y.


Informative missingness: What can we learn from patterns in missing laboratory data in the electronic health record?.

Tan A, Getzen E, Hutch M, Strasser Z, Gutierrez-Sacristan A, Le T J Biomed Inform. 2023; 139:104306.

PMID: 36738870 PMC: 10849195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104306.


References
1.
DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

2.
Statsenko Y, Al Zahmi F, Habuza T, Gorkom K, Zaki N . Prediction of COVID-19 severity using laboratory findings on admission: informative values, thresholds, ML model performance. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(2):e044500. PMC: 7918887. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044500. View

3.
Self W, Semler M, Leither L, Casey J, Angus D, Brower R . Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on Clinical Status at 14 Days in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020; 324(21):2165-2176. PMC: 7653542. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.22240. View

4.
Vahidy F, Drews A, Masud F, Schwartz R, Askary B, Boom M . Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients During Initial Peak and Resurgence in the Houston Metropolitan Area. JAMA. 2020; 324(10):998-1000. PMC: 7426882. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.15301. View

5.
Smilowitz N, Kunichoff D, Garshick M, Shah B, Pillinger M, Hochman J . C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(23):2270-2279. PMC: 7928982. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1103. View