» Articles » PMID: 3453273

Culling Patterns in Selected Minnesota Swine Breeding Herds

Overview
Journal Can J Vet Res
Date 1987 Oct 1
PMID 3453273
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This investigation was conducted to study culling patterns in swine breeding herds. Data were obtained from 89 Minnesota swine breeding herds and included 5918 sows and 1324 gilts for a total of 7242 culled femaled. Each producer was involved for 12 consecutive months. They were asked to record every female that was removed from the herd, the reason for its culling and its parity. The annual culling rate for the sample averaged 50%, but varied considerably between herds ranging from 15% to 85%. Culled females had produced an average of 3.77 litters. Half of the females culled did not produce more than three litters. Reproductive failure accounted for 32% of all removals. The average parity of the females culled in that category was only 2.37: almost 33% were gilts. Failure to conceive represented 75% of all females culled for reproductive failure. Proportionally, culling as a result of anestrus was higher in gilts. It accounted for 33% of all gilts culled for reproductive failure which was twice as much as for sows. Inadequate performance accounted for 17% of all removals. These sows had produced an average of 5.11 litters. These results indicated that few animals were culled on the basis of first litter performance. Old age comprised 14% of all removals and the average parity at culling for this category was 7.11. Death accounted for 12% and the average parity for these females was 3.40. Locomotor problems and peripartum problems were the cause of 28% and 23% of all deaths, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Monitoring Pig Structural Soundness and Body Weight in Pork Production Systems Using Computer Vision Approaches.

Jeon R, Rykaczewski C, Williams T, Harrington W, Kinder J, Trotter M Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075918 PMC: 11898204. DOI: 10.3390/ani15050635.


Elevated levels of C-reactive protein and pig major acute phase protein in lame gestating sows.

Jakobsen N, Larsen I, Weber N, Heegaard P, Pedersen K Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1505132.

PMID: 40046414 PMC: 11880936. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1505132.


A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system.

Plush K, Lines D, Staveley L, DSouza D, van Barneveld R Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1339947.

PMID: 39229595 PMC: 11370643. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1339947.


Characterization of Removal Reasons for Nurse Sows and the Associated Removal Due to Their Extended Lactation Length in Hyperprolific Farrow-Wean Herds.

Osotsi J, Balogh P, Novotnine-Danko G Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38891654 PMC: 11171024. DOI: 10.3390/ani14111607.


Non-ambulatory pigs in two Brazilian growing-finishing farms: a clinic, etiological and pathological perspective on 76 cases.

Piva M, Schwertz C, Henker L, Bianchi R, Kemper R, de Almeida B Porcine Health Manag. 2022; 8(1):36.

PMID: 35948945 PMC: 9364575. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-022-00279-6.


References
1.
Smith W, Robertson A . Observations on injuries to sows confined in part slatted stalls. Vet Rec. 1971; 89(20):531-3. DOI: 10.1136/vr.89.20.531. View

2.
Josse J, Le Denmat M, Martinat-Botte F, Vannier P, Vaudelet J . [Reasons for culling brood sows]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 1980; 122(6):341-9. View

3.
Halgaard C . Epidemiologic factors in puerperal diseases of sow. Nord Vet Med. 1983; 35(4):161-74. View

4.
Einarsson S, Linde C, Settergren I . Studies of the genital organs of gilts culled for anoestrus. Theriogenology. 1974; 2(5):109-13. DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(74)90033-8. View

5.
Stone M . Sow culling survey in alberta. Can Vet J. 1981; 22(11):363. PMC: 1789995. View