» Articles » PMID: 34532593

A Pilot Study for Exploring Blood Spot Anti-mullerian Hormone for Population-based Adolescent Reproductive Health Research

Overview
Publisher Open Access Text
Date 2021 Sep 17
PMID 34532593
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Objective: Studies of Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) rely upon serum measures and clinical samples of older reproductive-aged women intended/attempting pregnancy, with known fertility issues or medical morbidities. We explored the utility of minimally invasive AMH as a measure of fecundability in population-based reproductive health research.

Methods: We analyzed baseline data from 191 participants in a pilot, longitudinal cohort study, the Young Women's Stress Study. Using an integrated biosocial design, we collected interviewer-administered surveys on demographic, psychosocial, health, and method feasibility/acceptability information and finger-stick capillary dried blood spots (DBS). We used descriptive and bivariate statistics (correlation, T-tests, ANOVA) to estimate method feasibility/acceptability and unadjusted AMH mean concentrations overall and across sociodemographic, reproductive, and health covariates.

Results: AMH concentrations ranged from 1.02 to 22.23 ng/mL, with a mean of 5.66 ng/mL. AMH concentrations were associated with current hormonal contraceptive use, menstrual cycle frequency, and irregular menstrual patterns, but not with other known correlates. Most participants stated the DBS method was comfortable (81%) and would be likely to provide it again (88%).

Conclusions: While these pilot data suggest AMH fell within normal range and our DBS methods were acceptable/feasible, the broader question of its usefulness for population reproductive health research remains unanswered. Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to validate AMH against time-to-pregnancy and gold standard measures in young healthy samples and across different sociodemographic groups. Public health and social scientists should consider the resource costs of AMH, ethical issues, and risks of (over)interpretation, with a reproductive justice and human rights frame in mind.

References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
Barber J, Kusunoki Y, Gatny H . Design and implementation of an online weekly journal to study unintended pregnancies. Vienna Yearb Popul Res. 2012; 9:327-334. PMC: 3298188. DOI: 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s327. View

3.
Dewailly D, Andersen C, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R . The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20(3):370-85. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt062. View

4.
Su X, Carlson B, Wang X, Li X, Zhang Y, Montgomery J . Dried blood spots: An evaluation of utility in the field. J Infect Public Health. 2017; 11(3):373-376. PMC: 5874153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.09.014. View

5.
Fleming R, Seifer D, Frattarelli J, Ruman J . Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Müllerian hormone. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 31(4):486-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.015. View