» Articles » PMID: 34530800

Impact of a Health Literacy Intervention Combining General Practitioner Training and a Consumer Facing Intervention to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in Underserved Areas: Protocol for a Multicentric Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer burden worldwide. In France, it is the second most common cause of cancer death after lung cancer. Systematic uptake of CRC screening can improve survival rates. However, people with limited health literacy (HL) and lower socioeconomic position rarely participate. Our aim is to assess the impact of an intervention combining HL and CRC screening training for general practitioners (GPs) with a pictorial brochure and video targeting eligible patients, to increase CRC screening and other secondary outcomes, after 1 year, in several underserved geographic areas in France.

Methods: We will use a two-arm multicentric randomized controlled cluster trial with 32 GPs primarily serving underserved populations across four regions in France with 1024 patients recruited. GPs practicing in underserved areas (identified using the European Deprivation Index) will be block-randomized to: 1) a combined intervention (HL and CRC training + brochure and video for eligible patients), or 2) usual care. Patients will be included if they are between 50 and 74 years old, eligible for CRC screening, and present to recruited GPs. The primary outcome is CRC screening uptake after 1 year. Secondary outcomes include increasing knowledge and patient activation. After trial recruitment, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with up to 24 GPs (up to 8 in each region) and up to 48 patients (6 to 12 per region) based on data saturation. We will explore strategies that promote the intervention's sustained use and rapid implementation using Normalization Process Theory. We will follow a community-based participatory research approach throughout the trial. For the analyses, we will adopt a regression framework for all quantitative data. We will also use exploratory mediation analyses. We will analyze all qualitative data using a framework analysis guided by Normalization Process Theory.

Discussion: Limited HL and its impact on the general population is a growing public health and policy challenge worldwide. It has received limited attention in France. A combined HL intervention could reduce disparities in CRC screening, increase screening rates among the most vulnerable populations, and increase knowledge and activation (beneficial in the context of repeated screening).

Trial Registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.

Trial Registration Number: 2020-A01687-32 . Date of registration: 17th November 2020.

Citing Articles

Acceptability and implementation potential of colorectal cancer screening and health literacy training: A qualitative study among general practitioners in deprived areas.

Cazorla G, Redmond N, Lamouroux A, Boirot A, Rotily M, Addamiano M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0317910.

PMID: 39932910 PMC: 11813080. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317910.


Do summaries of evidence enable informed decision-making about COVID-19 and influenza vaccination equitably across more and less disadvantaged groups? Study protocol for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial of 'fact boxes' in health....

Ellermann C, Savaskan N, Rebitschek F BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e083515.

PMID: 39486820 PMC: 11529688. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083515.


Assessment of health literacy in a French emergency department.

Marie P, Romain-Scelle N, Potinet V, Schott A, Douplat M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):493.

PMID: 38649979 PMC: 11034065. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11003-1.


Racial and sociodemographic distribution of colorectal cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional study.

Adefemi K, Knight J, Zhu Y, Wang P Can J Public Health. 2024; 115(3):371-383.

PMID: 38485885 PMC: 11151886. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00859-9.


Increasing access to fertility preservation for women with breast cancer: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in France.

Addamiano M, Joannes C, Fonquerne L, Morel C, Lauzeille D, Belkadi L BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):231.

PMID: 38243214 PMC: 10797742. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17719-3.


References
1.
DeWalt D, Berkman N, Sheridan S, Lohr K, Pignone M . Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19(12):1228-39. PMC: 1492599. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x. View

2.
Hibbard J, Stockard J, Mahoney E, Tusler M . Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004; 39(4 Pt 1):1005-26. PMC: 1361049. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x. View

3.
Oldach B, Katz M . Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 94(2):149-57. PMC: 3946869. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001. View

4.
Mackenbach J, Stirbu I, Roskam A, Schaap M, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M . Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(23):2468-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0707519. View

5.
Peterson N, Dwyer K, Mulvaney S, Dietrich M, Rothman R . The influence of health literacy on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, beliefs and behavior. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007; 99(10):1105-12. PMC: 2574401. View