» Articles » PMID: 34528692

Communication Partner Engagement: A Relevant Factor for Functional Outcomes in Speech-Language Therapy for Aphasic Dementia

Abstract

Objectives: Previous reports established the feasibility of a telehealth model for delivering speech-language therapy via Internet videoconferencing, which connects individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) to an expert speech and language pathologist for treatment. This study reports feasibility of the same telehealth intervention in a larger set of progressive aphasia participants and explores factors potentially influencing functional intervention outcomes.

Methods: Participants with PPA or progressive aphasia in the context of a neurodegenerative dementia syndrome and their communication partners were enrolled into an 8-session intervention, with 3 evaluations (baseline, 2 months, and 6 months postenrollment). Half of the participants were randomized into a "check-in" group and received 3-monthly half-hour sessions postintervention. Mixed linear models with post hoc testing and percent change in area under the curve were used to examine communication confidence over time, as well as the influence of check-in sessions and the role of communication partner engagement on communication confidence.

Results: Communication confidence improved at the 2-month evaluation and showed no significant decline at the 6-month evaluation. Item-level analysis revealed gains in communication confidence across multiple communication contexts. Gains and maintenance of communication confidence were only present for the engaged communication partner group and were not bolstered by randomization to the check-in group.

Discussion: Internet-based, person-centered interventions demonstrate promise as a model for delivering speech-language therapy to individuals living with PPA. Maintenance is possible for at least 6 months postenrollment and is better for those with engaged communication partners, which supports the use of dyadic interventions.

Citing Articles

Communication Bridge-2 randomized controlled trial: Recruitment and baseline features.

Rogalski E, Bona M, Esparza M, Mooney A, Fried-Oken M, Rademaker A Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 21(1):e14168.

PMID: 39588869 PMC: 11771146. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14168.


Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.

Roheger M, Riemann S, Brauer A, McGowan E, Grittner U, Floel A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 5:CD015067.

PMID: 38808659 PMC: 11134511. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.


Feasibility study of Internet video-based speech-language activity for outpatients with primary progressive aphasia.

Higashi S, Koshibe Y, Miyazaki T, Watanabe R, Nakanome H, Inoue T PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288468.

PMID: 37440500 PMC: 10343066. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288468.


Access, referral, service provision and management of individuals with primary progressive aphasia: A survey of speech-language therapists in Italy.

Battista P, Piccininni M, Montembeault M, Messina A, Minafra B, Miller B Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023; 58(4):1046-1060.

PMID: 36636857 PMC: 10613933. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12843.


Use and Perceived Effectiveness of Communication Modes Reported by Persons With Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Mooney A, Bravo M, Roberts A, Salley E, Blaze E, Esparza M Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022; 32(1):298-305.

PMID: 36472941 PMC: 10023145. DOI: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00386.


References
1.
Mesulam M . Primary progressive aphasia--a language-based dementia. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(16):1535-42. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra022435. View

2.
Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Cherney L . Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97(12):2202-2221.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.023. View

3.
Massin P, Erginay A, Dupas B, Couturier A, Tadayoni R . Efficacy and safety of sustained-delivery fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant in patients with chronic diabetic macular edema insufficiently responsive to available therapies: a real-life study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:1257-64. PMC: 4944911. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S105385. View

4.
Cherney L, Babbitt E, Semik P, Heinemann A . Psychometric properties of the communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): phase 1. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011; 18(4):352-60. DOI: 10.1310/tsr1804-352. View

5.
Croot K . Treatment for Lexical Retrieval Impairments in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Research Update with Implications for Clinical Practice. Semin Speech Lang. 2018; 39(3):242-256. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660783. View