» Articles » PMID: 34527297

Enhancing Translational Team Effectiveness: The Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework for Translating Empirically Informed Strategies into Evidence-based Interventions

Overview
Date 2021 Sep 16
PMID 34527297
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Achieving the clinical, public health, economic, and policy benefits of translational science requires the integration and application of findings across biomedical, clinical, and behavioral science and health policy, and thus, collaboration across experts in these areas. To do so, translational teams need the skills, knowledge, and attitudes to mitigate challenges and build on strengths of cross-disciplinary collaboration. Though these competencies are not innate to teams, they can be built through the implementation of effective strategies and interventions. The Science of Team Science (SciTS) has contributed robust theories and evidence of empirically-informed strategies and best practices to enhance collaboration. Yet the field lacks methodological approaches to rigorously translate those strategies into evidence-based interventions to improve collaborative translational research. Here, we apply lessons from Implementation Science and Human-Centered Design & Engineering to describe the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science (WITS) framework, a process for translating established team science strategies into evidence-based interventions to bolster translational team effectiveness. To illustrate our use of WITS, we describe how University of Wisconsin's Institute for Clinical and Translational Research translated the existing Collaboration Planning framework into a robust, scalable, replicable intervention. We conclude with recommendations for future SciTS research to refine and test the framework.

Citing Articles

Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams.

Brown S, Sparapani R, Osinski K, Zhang J, Blessing J, Cheng F Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 32:100306.

PMID: 38510201 PMC: 10946054. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100306.


A randomized controlled trial of a team science intervention to enhance collaboration readiness and behavior among early career scholars in the Clinical and Translational Science Award network.

Hawk Jr L, Murphy T, Hartmann K, Burnett A, Maguin E J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e6.

PMID: 38384923 PMC: 10877513. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.692.


Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework.

Sweeney W, Kelly P, Brasier A, Rolland B J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e233.

PMID: 38028334 PMC: 10643908. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.649.


Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach.

Slade E, Kern P, Kegebein R, Liu C, Thompson J, Kelly T J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e59.

PMID: 37008617 PMC: 10052417. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.9.


Win-win interactions: Results and implications of a user needs assessment of clinical and translational scientists.

Casey S, Siebert-Evenstone A, Brasier A J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e73.

PMID: 37008601 PMC: 10052438. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.6.


References
1.
Lyon A, Munson S, Renn B, Atkins D, Pullmann M, Friedman E . Use of Human-Centered Design to Improve Implementation of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies in Low-Resource Communities: Protocol for Studies Applying a Framework to Assess Usability
. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019; 8(10):e14990. PMC: 6819011. DOI: 10.2196/14990. View

2.
Glasgow R, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A . Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(8):1261-7. PMC: 1447950. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1261. View

3.
Wooten K, Rose R, Ostir G, Calhoun W, Ameredes B, Brasier A . Assessing and evaluating multidisciplinary translational teams: a mixed methods approach. Eval Health Prof. 2013; 37(1):33-49. PMC: 4180502. DOI: 10.1177/0163278713504433. View

4.
Falk-Krzesinski H, Contractor N, Fiore S, Hall K, Kane C, Keyton J . Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science. Res Eval. 2012; 20(2):145-158. PMC: 3513779. DOI: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580. View

5.
Patsopoulos N . A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011; 13(2):217-24. PMC: 3181997. View