» Articles » PMID: 34523085

Long-Term (> 6 Years) Outcomes of Duodenal Switch (DS) Versus Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a Matched Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Obes Surg
Date 2021 Sep 15
PMID 34523085
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are no comparative studies on the long-term outcomes after the primary traditional duodenal switch (DS) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S).

Purpose: This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes in a matched cohort.

Setting: This study took place in a single private institute, in the USA.

Materials And Methods: Data from 266 patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic traditional DS or primary laparoscopic SADI-S from September 2011 to December 2015 by four surgeons were used for a retrospective matched cohort. Data were obtained by matching every DS patient to a SADI-S patient of the same age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). In addition, only patients that were out at least 5 years and had a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in the study.

Results: The matched cohort included 30 DS and 30 SADI-S patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative characteristics and baseline comorbidities between both groups. The SADI-S patients had significantly shorter operative time and length of stay. The overall long-term complications, especially the long-term Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications, were significantly fewer with SADI-S. At 6 years, the DS patients had statistically higher %EWL; however, the ending BMIs were statistically similar between both groups. There were no significant differences in the long-term comorbidity and nutritional outcomes of both groups. The long-term failure rates were comparable.

Conclusions: Most long-term outcomes of SADI-S were either similar or significantly better than DS. Part of the reasons could be the surgeon's learning curve and the small sample sizes of both groups.

Citing Articles

Outpatient Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass: Is It a Safe Option? A MBSAQIP Database Analysis.

Manueli Laos E, Ducas A, Potts C, Schlottmann F, Masrur M Obes Surg. 2025; 35(3):784-789.

PMID: 39853575 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-07691-1.


Loop duodenal switch confers more complications with little gain of weight loss compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Joseph S, Rwigema J, Anderson D, Ishi S, Crafts T, Kuchta K Surg Endosc. 2024; 39(2):1261-1268.

PMID: 39557645 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11264-1.


Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy/Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/SADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2023.

Ponce de Leon-Ballesteros G, Romero-Velez G, Higa K, Himpens J, O Kane M, Torres A Obes Surg. 2024; 34(10):3639-3685.

PMID: 39264553 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07490-0.


Perioperative Safety and 1-Year Outcomes of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) vs. Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Axer S, Al-Tai S, Ihle C, Alwan M, Hoffmann L Obes Surg. 2024; 34(9):3382-3389.

PMID: 39042310 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07421-z.


Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal bypass (SADI-S) as Primary or Two-Stage Surgery: Mid-Term Outcomes of a Single Canadian Bariatric Center.

Deffain A, Denis R, Pescarus R, Garneau P, Atlas H, Studer A Obes Surg. 2024; 34(4):1207-1216.

PMID: 38363495 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07095-7.


References
1.
Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D, Belnap L, Cottam A, Cottam S . A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017; 13(3):415-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.020. View

2.
Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam S . A Matched Cohort Analysis of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus Saving (SIPS) Surgery Versus Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch with Two-Year Follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016; 27(2):454-461. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2341-7. View

3.
Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera M, Perez-Aguirre E, Garcia Perez J, Cabrerizo L, Valladares L . Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007; 17(12):1614-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8. View

4.
Marceau P, Biron S, Hould F, Lebel S, Marceau S, Lescelleur O . Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2008; 17(11):1421-30. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-008-9435-9. View

5.
Sethi M, Chau E, Youn A, Jiang Y, Fielding G, Ren-Fielding C . Long-term outcomes after biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch: 2-, 5-, and 10-year data. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016; 12(9):1697-1705. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.03.006. View