» Articles » PMID: 34522501

Comparison of the Accuracy of Modified CT Severity Index Score and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Assessing the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2021 Sep 15
PMID 34522501
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Acute pancreatitis is an acute gastrointestinal emergency with significant morbidity and mortality if not treated. It can lead to local as well as systemic complications and has a prevalence of 51.07%. Laboratory investigations such as amylase and lipase and ultrasound scan are typically used for the diagnosis. A contrast-enhanced CT scan is considered the gold standard. Both laboratory and radiological investigation-based scoring systems have been reported in the literature and are in practice. However, these modalities demand several laboratory investigations and are expensive. Our study aims to determine the congruency of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the modified CT severity index score (MCTSI) with the revised Atlanta classification in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. In addition, the accuracy of NLR and MCTSI is determined. The secondary objective is to determine whether NLR can predict the severity of acute pancreatitis to the same extent as MCTSI through expensive radiological imaging and other clinical scoring systems through a list of investigations. Methodology The data for this study were collected retrospectively and patients with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included through the nonprobability convenience sampling method. All patients underwent relevant laboratory workup (including complete blood count) and radiological workup (including CT scan) during their hospital stay. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NLR and MCTSI, and the congruency of these with the revised Atlanta classification in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. Results A total of 166 patients with acute pancreatitis were included, of which 107 (64.45%) were males and 59 (35.55%) were females, with a mean age of 43.7. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NLR were 67%, 90.9%, and 76%, respectively, whereas the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MCTSI were 95%, 13.6%, and 62%, respectively. The area under the curve for NLR was 0.855 whereas that for MCTSI was determined to be 0.645. Conclusions NLR has a good concordance with the revised Atlanta classification and assesses the disease severity, especially in moderate-to-severe cases of acute pancreatitis compared to MCTSI. In addition, NLR can be used in acute and/or resource-poor settings to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Efficacy of Modified CT Severity Index Versus Conventional CT Severity Index in Determining Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Ashraf Cheema A, Sharif G, Kumar S, Butt H, Khan I, Hussain J Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73771.

PMID: 39677156 PMC: 11646560. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73771.


Construction and alidation of a severity prediction model for acute pancreatitis based on CT severity index: A retrospective case-control study.

Han X, Hu M, Ji P, Liu Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303684.

PMID: 38787912 PMC: 11125528. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303684.


NLR48 is Better Than CRP, and mCTSI, and Similar to BISAP and SOFA Scores for Mortality Prediction in Acute Pancreatitis: A Comparison of 6 Scores.

Cazacu S, Parscoveanu M, Cartu D, Moraru E, Rogoveanu I, Ungureanu B J Inflamm Res. 2023; 16:4793-4804.

PMID: 37881651 PMC: 10596122. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S432408.


Predictive value of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis.

Zhao Y, Xia W, Lu Y, Chen W, Zhao Y, Zhuang Y Front Surg. 2023; 9:1026604.

PMID: 36704518 PMC: 9871615. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1026604.

References
1.
Kokulu K, Gunaydin Y, Akilli N, Koylu R, Sert E, Koylu O . Relationship between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in acute pancreatitis and the severity and systemic complications of the disease. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018; 29(6):684-691. PMC: 6284671. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17563. View

2.
Lankisch P, Apte M, Banks P . Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2015; 386(9988):85-96. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60649-8. View

3.
Rehan A, Shabbir Z, Shaukat A, Riaz O . Diagnostic Accuracy of Modified CT Severity Index in Assessing Severity of Acute Pancreatitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017; 26(12):967-970. DOI: 2496. View

4.
Gezer N, Bengi G, Baran A, Erkmen P, Topalak O, Altay C . Comparison of radiological scoring systems, clinical scores, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and serum C-reactive protein level for severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020; 66(6):762-770. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.6.762. View

5.
Banks P . Infected necrosis: morbidity and therapeutic consequences. Hepatogastroenterology. 1991; 38(2):116-9. View