» Articles » PMID: 34519964

Identification of a Rule to Predict Response to Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Machine Learning and Clinical Trial Data

Abstract

Introduction: In rheumatoid arthritis, time spent using ineffective medications may lead to irreversible disease progression. Despite availability of targeted treatments, only a minority of patients achieve sustained remission, and little evidence exists to direct the choice of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in individual patients. Machine learning was used to identify a rule to predict the response to sarilumab and discriminate between responses to sarilumab versus adalimumab, with a focus on clinically feasible blood biomarkers.

Methods: The decision tree model GUIDE was trained using a data subset from the sarilumab trial with the most biomarker data, MOBILITY, to identify a rule to predict disease activity after sarilumab 200 mg. The training set comprised 18 categorical and 24 continuous baseline variables; some data were omitted from training and used for validation by the algorithm (cross-validation). The rule was tested using full datasets from four trials (MOBILITY, MONARCH, TARGET, and ASCERTAIN), focusing on the recommended sarilumab dose of 200 mg.

Results: In the training set, the presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, combined with C-reactive protein > 12.3 mg/l, was identified as the "rule" that predicts American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) to sarilumab. In testing, the rule reliably predicted response to sarilumab in MOBILITY, MONARCH, and ASCERTAIN for many efficacy parameters (e.g., ACR70 and the 28-joint disease activity score using CRP [DAS28-CRP] remission). The rule applied less to TARGET, which recruited individuals refractory to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The potential clinical benefit of the rule was highlighted in a clinical scenario based on MONARCH data, which found that increased ACR70 rates could be achieved by treating either rule-positive patients with sarilumab or rule-negative patients with adalimumab.

Conclusions: Well-established and clinically feasible blood biomarkers can guide individual treatment choice. Real-world validation of the rule identified in this post hoc analysis is merited.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01061736, NCT02332590, NCT01709578, NCT01768572.

Citing Articles

What have we learnt from the inhibition of IL-6 in RA and what are the clinical opportunities for patient outcomes?.

Taylor P, Feist E, Pope J, Nash P, Sibilia J, Caporali R Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024; 16:1759720X241283340.

PMID: 39444594 PMC: 11497505. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X241283340.


Machine learning-based remission prediction in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: findings from the Kuwait rheumatic disease registry.

Alsaber A, Al-Herz A, Alawadhi B, Doush I, Setiya P, Al-Sultan A Front Big Data. 2024; 7:1406365.

PMID: 39421133 PMC: 11484091. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1406365.


Real-World Sarilumab Use and Rule Testing to Predict Treatment Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Findings from the RISE Registry.

Curtis J, Yun H, Chen L, Ford S, van Hoogstraten H, Fiore S Rheumatol Ther. 2023; 10(4):1055-1072.

PMID: 37349636 PMC: 10326227. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00568-8.


Anti-citrullinated protein antibody profiles predict changes in disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating biologics.

Aripova N, Kremer J, Pappas D, Reed G, England B, Robinson B Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023; 63(2):542-550.

PMID: 37252826 PMC: 10836988. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead260.


Comparative effectiveness of TNF inhibitor vs IL-6 receptor inhibitor as monotherapy or combination therapy with methotrexate in biologic-experienced patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis from the CorEvitas RA Registry.

Sebba A, Bingham C, Bykerk V, Fiore S, Ford K, Janak J Clin Rheumatol. 2023; 42(8):2037-2051.

PMID: 37060528 PMC: 10345054. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06588-7.


References
1.
Giacomelli R, Afeltra A, Alunno A, Bartoloni-Bocci E, Berardicurti O, Bombardieri M . Guidelines for biomarkers in autoimmune rheumatic diseases - evidence based analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2018; 18(1):93-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.08.003. View

2.
Hugle M, Omoumi P, van Laar J, Boedecker J, Hugle T . Applied machine learning and artificial intelligence in rheumatology. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020; 4(1):rkaa005. PMC: 7151725. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaa005. View

3.
Genovese M, Fleischmann R, Kivitz A, Rell-Bakalarska M, Martincova R, Fiore S . Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67(6):1424-37. DOI: 10.1002/art.39093. View

4.
Burmester G, Lin Y, Patel R, van Adelsberg J, Mangan E, Graham N . Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016; 76(5):840-847. PMC: 5530335. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310. View

5.
Boyapati A, Schwartzman S, Msihid J, Choy E, Genovese M, Burmester G . Association of High Serum Interleukin-6 Levels With Severe Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Increased Treatment Response Differentiating Sarilumab From Adalimumab or Methotrexate in a Post Hoc Analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72(9):1456-1466. PMC: 7496495. DOI: 10.1002/art.41299. View