» Articles » PMID: 34518576

Mean Heart Dose-based Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model for Pericardial Effusion: a Study in Oesophageal Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Sep 14
PMID 34518576
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the incidence of pericardial effusion (PCE) based on the mean heart dose (MHD) in patients with oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. The incidences of PCE in any grade (A-PCE) and symptomatic PCE (S-PCE) were evaluated separately. To identify predictors for PCE, several clinical and dose-volume parameters were analysed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate regression analysis. To validate its clinical applicability, the generated NTCP model was compared to the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model. Among 229 eligible patients, A-PCE and S-PCE were observed in 100 (43.7%) and 18 (7.9%) patients, respectively. MHD showed a preferable area under the curve (AUC) value for S-PCE (AUC = 0.821) and A-PCE (AUC = 0.734). MHD was the only significant predictor for A-PCE; MHD and hypertension were selected as significant factors for S-PCE. The estimated NTCP, using the MHD-based model, showed excellent correspondence to the LKB model in A-PCE and S-PCE. The NTCP curve of A-PCE was gentler than that of S-PCE and had no threshold. The MHD-based NTCP model was simple but comparable to the LKB model for both A-PCE and S-PCE. Therefore, the estimated NTCP may provide clinically useful parameters for predicting PCE.

Citing Articles

Moving beyond mean heart dose: The importance of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy toxicity.

Bowen Jones S, Marchant T, Saunderson C, McWilliam A, Banfill K J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 68(8):974-986.

PMID: 39228181 PMC: 11686456. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13737.


Application research on reducing radiation-induced lung injury with a trigger operator based on overlap volume histogram (OVH) in breast cancer postoperative radiotherapy.

Li Q, Deng F, Pan X, Bai H, Bai J, Liu X Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22042.

PMID: 38086847 PMC: 10716111. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49282-z.


Comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy beam configurations for treating thoracic esophageal cancer.

Oonsiri S, Kitpanit S, Kannarunimit D, Chakkabat C, Lertbutsayanukul C, Prayongrat A Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022; 22:51-56.

PMID: 35514527 PMC: 9065423. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.005.

References
1.
Hancock S, Donaldson S, Hoppe R . Cardiac disease following treatment of Hodgkin's disease in children and adolescents. J Clin Oncol. 1993; 11(7):1208-15. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.7.1208. View

2.
Fukada J, Shigematsu N, Takeuchi H, Ohashi T, Saikawa Y, Takaishi H . Symptomatic pericardial effusion after chemoradiation therapy in esophageal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87(3):487-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.008. View

3.
Niemierko A . Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. Med Phys. 1997; 24(1):103-10. DOI: 10.1118/1.598063. View

4.
Dawson L, Normolle D, Balter J, McGinn C, Lawrence T, Ten Haken R . Analysis of radiation-induced liver disease using the Lyman NTCP model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 53(4):810-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02846-8. View

5.
Burman C, Kutcher G, Emami B, Goitein M . Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991; 21(1):123-35. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90172-z. View