» Articles » PMID: 34515636

Addressing Shortfalls of Laboratory HbA Using a Model That Incorporates Red Cell Lifespan

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Sep 13
PMID 34515636
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laboratory HbA does not always predict diabetes complications and our aim was to establish a glycaemic measure that better reflects intracellular glucose exposure in organs susceptible to complications. Six months of continuous glucose monitoring data and concurrent laboratory HbA were evaluated from 51 type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 80 type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Red blood cell (RBC) lifespan was estimated using a kinetic model of glucose and HbA, allowing the calculation of person-specific adjusted HbA (aHbA). Median (IQR) RBC lifespan was 100 (86-102) and 100 (83-101) days in T1D and T2D, respectively. The median (IQR) absolute difference between aHbA and laboratory HbA was 3.9 (3.0-14.3) mmol/mol [0.4 (0.3-1.3%)] in T1D and 5.3 (4.1-22.5) mmol/mol [0.5 (0.4-2.0%)] in T2D. aHbA and laboratory HbA showed clinically relevant differences. This suggests that the widely used measurement of HbA can underestimate or overestimate diabetes complication risks, which may have future clinical implications.

Citing Articles

Evaluating HbA-to-average glucose conversion with patient-specific kinetic models for diverse populations.

Sato Imuro S, Sabharwal A, Bevier W, Kerr D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22098.

PMID: 39333162 PMC: 11437029. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72837-7.


Management of diabetes mellitus patients with sickle cell anemia: Challenges and therapeutic approaches.

Obeagu E, Obeagu G Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(17):e37941.

PMID: 38669382 PMC: 11049766. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037941.


Is It Time to Move Beyond TIR to TITR? Real-World Data from Over 20,000 Users of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

Dunn T, Ajjan R, Bergenstal R, Xu Y Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024; 26(3):203-210.

PMID: 38444315 PMC: 10877396. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0565.


Red blood cells as biomarkers and mediators in complications of diabetes mellitus: A review.

Obeagu E Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(8):e37265.

PMID: 38394525 PMC: 11309633. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037265.


The Glucose Management Indicator: Time to Change Course?.

Selvin E Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(6):906-914.

PMID: 38295402 PMC: 11116920. DOI: 10.2337/dci23-0086.


References
1.
Cohen R, Holmes Y, Chenier T, Joiner C . Discordance between HbA1c and fructosamine: evidence for a glycosylation gap and its relation to diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care. 2002; 26(1):163-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.1.163. View

2.
Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kroger J, Weitgasser R . Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388(10057):2254-2263. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5. View

3.
English E, Lenters-Westra E . HbA1c method performance: The great success story of global standardization. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018; 55(6):408-419. DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2018.1480591. View

4.
Xu Y, Grimsmann J, Karges B, Hofer S, Danne T, Holl R . Personal Glycation Factors and Calculated Hemoglobin A1c for Diabetes Management: Real-World Data from the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) Registry. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021; 23(6):452-459. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0553. View

5.
Kameyama M, Takeuchi S, Ishii S . Steady-state relationship between average glucose, HbA1c and RBC lifespan. J Theor Biol. 2018; 447:111-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.03.023. View