» Articles » PMID: 34515589

The Effect of Body Position and the Reliability of Upper Limb Arterial Occlusion Pressure Using a Handheld Doppler Ultrasound for Blood Flow Restriction Training

Overview
Journal Sports Health
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Sep 13
PMID 34515589
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The precise calculation of arterial occlusive pressure is essential to accurately prescribe individualized pressures during blood flow restriction training. Arterial occlusion pressure in the lower limb varies significantly between different body positions while similar reports for the upper limb are lacking.

Hypothesis: Body position has a significant effect in upper limb arterial occlusive pressure. Using cuffs with manual pump and a handheld Doppler ultrasound can be a reliable method to determine upper limb arterial blood flow restriction.

Study Design: A randomized repeated measures design.

Level Of Evidence: Level 3.

Methods: Forty-two healthy participants (age mean ± SD = 28.1 ± 7.7 years) completed measurements in supine, seated, and standing position by 3 blinded raters. A cuff with a manual pump and a handheld acoustic ultrasound were used. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction was used to analyze differences between body positions. A within-subject coefficient of variation and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test were used to calculate reproducibility and reliability, respectively.

Results: A significantly higher upper limb arterial occlusive pressure was found in seated compared with supine position ( < 0.031) and in supine compared with standing position ( < 0.031) in all raters. An ICC of 0.894 (95% CI = 0.824-0.939, < 0.001) was found in supine, 0.973 (95% CI = 0.955-0.985, < 0.001) in seated, and 0.984 (95% CI = 0.973-0.991, < 0.001) in standing position. ICC for test-retest reliability was found 0.90 (95% CI = 0.814-0.946, < 0.001), 0.873 (95% CI = 0.762-0.93, < 0.001), and 0.858 (95% CI = 0.737-0.923, < 0.001) in the supine, seated, and standing position, respectively.

Conclusion: Upper limb arterial occlusive pressure was significantly dependent on body position. The method showed excellent interrater reliability and repeatability between different days.

Clinical Relevance: Prescription of individualized pressures during blood flow restriction training requires measurement of upper limb arterial occlusive pressure in the appropriate position. The use of occlusion cuffs with a manual pump and a handheld Doppler ultrasound showed excellent reliability; however, the increased measurement error compared with the differences in arterial occlusive pressure between certain positions should be carefully considered for the clinical application of the method.

Strength Of Recommendations Taxonomy (sort): B.

Citing Articles

Comparing the acute responses between a manual and automated blood flow restriction system.

Carter D, Chatlaong M, Miller W, Benton J, Jessee M Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1409702.

PMID: 38948082 PMC: 11211589. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1409702.


Validity and reliability of a wearable blood flow restriction training device for arterial occlusion pressure assessment.

Zhang W, Zhuang S, Chen Y, Wang H Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1404247.

PMID: 38911327 PMC: 11191424. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1404247.


The effects of lower limb ischaemic preconditioning: a systematic review.

French C, Robbins D, Gernigon M, Gordon D Front Physiol. 2024; 14:1323310.

PMID: 38274048 PMC: 10808809. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1323310.


Development of a prediction equation to estimate lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure with a thigh sphygmomanometer.

Wedig I, Lennox I, Petushek E, McDANIEL J, Durocher J, Elmer S Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 124(4):1281-1295.

PMID: 38001245 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05352-8.


Use of a handheld Doppler to measure brachial and femoral artery occlusion pressure.

Vehrs P, Richards S, Blazzard C, Hart H, Kasper N, Lacey R Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1239582.

PMID: 37664423 PMC: 10470651. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1239582.


References
1.
Sieljacks P, Knudsen L, Wernbom M, Vissing K . Body position influences arterial occlusion pressure: implications for the standardization of pressure during blood flow restricted exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017; 118(2):303-312. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3770-2. View

2.
Lixandrao M, Ugrinowitsch C, Berton R, Vechin F, Conceicao M, Damas F . Magnitude of Muscle Strength and Mass Adaptations Between High-Load Resistance Training Versus Low-Load Resistance Training Associated with Blood-Flow Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017; 48(2):361-378. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y. View

3.
Bennett H, Slattery F . Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Aerobic Capacity and Performance: A Systematic Review. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 33(2):572-583. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002963. View

4.
Yasuda T, Abe T, Brechue W, Iida H, Takano H, Meguro K . Venous blood gas and metabolite response to low-intensity muscle contractions with external limb compression. Metabolism. 2010; 59(10):1510-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.01.016. View

5.
Laurentino G, Loenneke J, Mouser J, Buckner S, Counts B, Dankel S . Validity of the Handheld Doppler to Determine Lower-Limb Blood Flow Restriction Pressure for Exercise Protocols. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 34(9):2693-2696. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002665. View