» Articles » PMID: 34513330

Reef Manta Rays Forage on Tidally Driven, High Density Zooplankton Patches in Hanifaru Bay, Maldives

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2021 Sep 13
PMID 34513330
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Manta rays forage for zooplankton in tropical and subtropical marine environments, which are generally nutrient-poor. Feeding often occurs at predictable locations where these large, mobile cartilaginous fishes congregate to exploit ephemeral productivity hotspots. Investigating the zooplankton dynamics that lead to such feeding aggregations remains a key question for understanding their movement ecology. The aim of this study is to investigate the feeding environment at the largest known aggregation for reef manta rays in the world. We sampled zooplankton throughout the tidal cycle, and recorded activity and behaviour, alongside environmental variables at Hanifaru Bay, Maldives. We constructed generalised linear models to investigate possible relationships between zooplankton dynamics, environmental parameters, and how they influenced abundance, behaviour, and foraging strategies. Zooplankton biomass changed rapidly throughout the tidal cycle, and feeding events were significantly related to high zooplankton biomass. switched from non-feeding to feeding behaviour at a prey density threshold of 53.7 mg dry mass m; more than double the calculated density estimates needed to theoretically meet their metabolic requirements. The highest numbers of observed in Hanifaru Bay corresponded to when they were engaged in feeding behaviour. The community composition of zooplankton was different when was feeding (dominated by copepods and crustaceans) compared to when present but not feeding (more gelatinous species present than in feeding samples). The dominant zooplankton species recorded was . This is a large-bodied calanoid copepod species that blooms in oceanic waters, suggesting offshore influences at the site. Here, we have characterised aspects of the feeding environment for in Hanifaru Bay and identified some of the conditions that may result in large aggregations of this threatened planktivore, and this information can help inform management of this economically important marine protected area.

Citing Articles

Filter feeding in devil rays is highly sensitive to morphology.

Kahane-Rapport S, Teeple J, Liao J, Paig-Tran E, Strother J Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20242037.

PMID: 39837516 PMC: 11750363. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2037.


Genomic evidence indicates small island-resident populations and sex-biased behaviors of Hawaiian reef Manta Rays.

Whitney J, Coleman R, Deakos M BMC Ecol Evol. 2023; 23(1):31.

PMID: 37422622 PMC: 10329317. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-023-02130-0.

References
1.
Hays G, Hobson V, Metcalfe J, Righton D, Sims D . Flexible foraging movements of leatherback turtles across the North Atlantic Ocean. Ecology. 2006; 87(10):2647-56. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2647:ffmolt]2.0.co;2. View

2.
Burgess K, Couturier L, Marshall A, Richardson A, Weeks S, Bennett M . , predator of the deep? Insight into the diet of the giant manta ray through stable isotope analysis. R Soc Open Sci. 2016; 3(11):160717. PMC: 5180158. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160717. View

3.
Fox S, Foisy I, De La Parra Venegas R, Galvan Pastoriza B, Graham R, Hoffmayer E . Population structure and residency of whale sharks Rhincodon typus at Utila, Bay Islands, Honduras. J Fish Biol. 2013; 83(3):574-87. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12195. View

4.
Armstrong A, Armstrong A, Bennett M, Richardson A, Townsend K, Everett J . Mutualism promotes site selection in a large marine planktivore. Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(10):5606-5623. PMC: 8131819. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7464. View

5.
Fortune S, Ferguson S, Trites A, Hudson J, Baumgartner M . Bowhead whales use two foraging strategies in response to fine-scale differences in zooplankton vertical distribution. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):20249. PMC: 7680138. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76071-9. View