» Articles » PMID: 34511083

The Burden of Recording and Reporting Health Data in Primary Health Care Facilities in Five Low- and Lower-middle Income Countries

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Sep 13
PMID 34511083
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recording and reporting health data in facilities is the backbone of routine health information systems which provide data collected by health facility workers during service provision. Data is firstly collected in a register, to record patient health data and care process, and tallied into nationally designed reporting forms. While there is anecdotal evidence of large numbers of registers and reporting forms for primary health care (PHC) facilities, there are few systematic studies to document this potential burden on health workers. This multi-country study aimed to document the numbers of registers and reporting forms use at the PHC level and to estimate the time it requires for health workers to meet data demands.

Methods: In Cambodia, Ghana, Mozambique, Nigeria and Tanzania, a desk review was conducted to document registers and reporting forms mandated at the PHC level. In each country, visits to 16 randomly selected public PHC facilities followed to assess the time spent on paper-based recording and reporting. Information was collected through self-reports of estimated time use by health workers, and observation of 1360 provider-patient interactions. Data was primarily collected in outpatient care (OPD), antenatal care (ANC), immunization (EPI), family planning (FP), HIV and Tuberculosis (TB) services.

Result: Cross-countries, the average number of registers was 34 (ranging between 16 and 48). Of those, 77% were verified in use and each register line had at least 20 cells to be completed per patient. The mean time spent on recording was about one-third the total consultation time for OPD, FP, ANC and EPI services combined. Cross-countries, the average number of monthly reporting forms was 35 (ranging between 19 and 52) of which 78% were verified in use. The estimated time to complete monthly reporting forms was 9 h (ranging between 4 to 15 h) per month per health worker.

Conclusions: PHC facilities are mandated to use many registers and reporting forms pausing a considerable burden to health workers. Service delivery systems are expected to vary, however an imperative need remains to invest in international standards of facility-based registers and reporting forms, to ensure regular, comparable, quality-driven facility data collection and use.

Citing Articles

Health data management practice and associated factors among health professionals working in public health facilities in Oromia Special Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Molla A, Hayelom M, Adamu K, Mihiretu M, Adem Y BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(1):e000807.

PMID: 40018093 PMC: 11812884. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000807.


Workload in antenatal care before and after implementation of an electronic decision support system: an observed time-motion study of healthcare providers in Nepal.

Radovich E, Das S, Karki S, Bottomley C, McCarthy O, Penn-Kekana L BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025; 25(1):87.

PMID: 39966864 PMC: 11834578. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02868-1.


Neonatal indicator data in Tanzania District Health Information System: evaluation of availability and quality of selected newborn indicators, 2015-2022.

Shabani J, Salim N, Bohne C, Day L, Kumalija C, Makuwani A BMC Pediatr. 2025; 23(Suppl 2):658.

PMID: 39849367 PMC: 11755859. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-025-05417-x.


An evaluation of the Hawthorne effect in a clinical trial of trauma care in Ghana.

Gyedu A, Amponsah-Manu F, Mensah S, Donkor P, Mock C World J Surg. 2024; 48(12):3020-3026.

PMID: 39516191 PMC: 11733515. DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12410.


Routine health data use for decision making and its associated factors among primary healthcare managers in dodoma region.

Yusuph F, Ntwenya J, Kinyaga A, Gibore N BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1168.

PMID: 39363188 PMC: 11447978. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11658-w.


References
1.
Irving G, Neves A, Dambha-Miller H, Oishi A, Tagashira H, Verho A . International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(10):e017902. PMC: 5695512. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902. View

2.
Meribole E, Makinde O, Oyemakinde A, Oyediran K, Atobatele A, Fadeyibi F . The Nigerian health information system policy review of 2014 : the need, content, expectations and progress. Health Info Libr J. 2018; 35(4):285-297. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12240. View

3.
Maiga A, Jiwani S, Mutua M, Porth T, Taylor C, Asiki G . Generating statistics from health facility data: the state of routine health information systems in Eastern and Southern Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4(5):e001849. PMC: 6768347. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001849. View

4.
Singh S, Upadhyaya S, Deshmukh P, Dongre A, Dwivedi N, Dey D . Time motion study using mixed methods to assess service delivery by frontline health workers from South India: methods. Hum Resour Health. 2018; 16(1):17. PMC: 5879838. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-018-0279-7. View

5.
Oluoch T, Santas X, Kwaro D, Were M, Biondich P, Bailey C . The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2012; 81(10):e83-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.010. View