Growth-defense Trade-offs Shape Population Genetic Composition in an Iconic Forest Tree Species
Overview
Affiliations
All organisms experience fundamental conflicts between divergent metabolic processes. In plants, a pivotal conflict occurs between allocation to growth, which accelerates resource acquisition, and to defense, which protects existing tissue against herbivory. Trade-offs between growth and defense traits are not universally observed, and a central prediction of plant evolutionary ecology is that context-dependence of these trade-offs contributes to the maintenance of intraspecific variation in defense [Züst and Agrawal, , 68, 513-534 (2017)]. This prediction has rarely been tested, however, and the evolutionary consequences of growth-defense trade-offs in different environments are poorly understood, especially in long-lived species [Cipollini , (Wiley, 2014), pp. 263-307]. Here we show that intraspecific trait trade-offs, even when fixed across divergent environments, interact with competition to drive natural selection of tree genotypes corresponding to their growth-defense phenotypes. Our results show that a functional trait trade-off, when coupled with environmental variation, causes real-time divergence in the genetic architecture of tree populations in an experimental setting. Specifically, competitive selection for faster growth resulted in dominance by fast-growing tree genotypes that were poorly defended against natural enemies. This outcome is a signature example of eco-evolutionary dynamics: Competitive interactions affected microevolutionary trajectories on a timescale relevant to subsequent ecological interactions [Brunner , 33, 7-12 (2019)]. Eco-evolutionary drivers of tree growth and defense are thus critical to stand-level trait variation, which structures communities and ecosystems over expansive spatiotemporal scales.
Liao Z, Zhu L, Liu L, Kreuzwieser J, Werner C, Du B Metabolites. 2024; 14(8).
PMID: 39195549 PMC: 11356491. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14080453.
Lindroth R, Zierden M, Morrow C, Fernandez P Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70046.
PMID: 39161623 PMC: 11331496. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70046.
Testing intra-species variation in allocation to growth and defense in rubber tree ().
Rungwattana K, Kasemsap P, Phumichai T, Rattanawong R, Hietz P PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17877.
PMID: 39131614 PMC: 11317040. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17877.
Yataco A, Noor S, Girona M, Work T, Despland E Insects. 2024; 15(3).
PMID: 38535391 PMC: 10971650. DOI: 10.3390/insects15030196.
Li Y, Mo Y, Cui H, Zhang Y, Dossa G, Tan Z Tree Physiol. 2024; 44(2).
PMID: 38198737 PMC: 11811040. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpae007.