» Articles » PMID: 34507992

Growth-defense Trade-offs Shape Population Genetic Composition in an Iconic Forest Tree Species

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Sep 11
PMID 34507992
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

All organisms experience fundamental conflicts between divergent metabolic processes. In plants, a pivotal conflict occurs between allocation to growth, which accelerates resource acquisition, and to defense, which protects existing tissue against herbivory. Trade-offs between growth and defense traits are not universally observed, and a central prediction of plant evolutionary ecology is that context-dependence of these trade-offs contributes to the maintenance of intraspecific variation in defense [Züst and Agrawal, , 68, 513-534 (2017)]. This prediction has rarely been tested, however, and the evolutionary consequences of growth-defense trade-offs in different environments are poorly understood, especially in long-lived species [Cipollini , (Wiley, 2014), pp. 263-307]. Here we show that intraspecific trait trade-offs, even when fixed across divergent environments, interact with competition to drive natural selection of tree genotypes corresponding to their growth-defense phenotypes. Our results show that a functional trait trade-off, when coupled with environmental variation, causes real-time divergence in the genetic architecture of tree populations in an experimental setting. Specifically, competitive selection for faster growth resulted in dominance by fast-growing tree genotypes that were poorly defended against natural enemies. This outcome is a signature example of eco-evolutionary dynamics: Competitive interactions affected microevolutionary trajectories on a timescale relevant to subsequent ecological interactions [Brunner , 33, 7-12 (2019)]. Eco-evolutionary drivers of tree growth and defense are thus critical to stand-level trait variation, which structures communities and ecosystems over expansive spatiotemporal scales.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Growth and Metabolomic Profiles of Two Afforestation Cypress Species and Grown at Minjiang Valley in Southwest China.

Liao Z, Zhu L, Liu L, Kreuzwieser J, Werner C, Du B Metabolites. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39195549 PMC: 11356491. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14080453.


Forest defoliation by an invasive outbreak insect: Catastrophic consequences for a charismatic mega moth.

Lindroth R, Zierden M, Morrow C, Fernandez P Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70046.

PMID: 39161623 PMC: 11331496. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70046.


Testing intra-species variation in allocation to growth and defense in rubber tree ().

Rungwattana K, Kasemsap P, Phumichai T, Rattanawong R, Hietz P PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17877.

PMID: 39131614 PMC: 11317040. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17877.


Limited Differences in Insect Herbivory on Young White Spruce Growing in Small Open Plantations and under Natural Canopies in Boreal Mixed Forests.

Yataco A, Noor S, Girona M, Work T, Despland E Insects. 2024; 15(3).

PMID: 38535391 PMC: 10971650. DOI: 10.3390/insects15030196.


Intraspecific plasticity and co-variation of leaf traits facilitate Ficus tinctoria to acclimate hemiepiphytic and terrestrial habitats.

Li Y, Mo Y, Cui H, Zhang Y, Dossa G, Tan Z Tree Physiol. 2024; 44(2).

PMID: 38198737 PMC: 11811040. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpae007.


References
1.
Barker H, Riehl J, Bernhardsson C, Rubert-Nason K, Holeski L, Ingvarsson P . Linking plant genes to insect communities: Identifying the genetic bases of plant traits and community composition. Mol Ecol. 2019; 28(19):4404-4421. DOI: 10.1111/mec.15158. View

2.
Cope O, Lindroth R, Helm A, Keefover-Ring K, Kruger E . Trait plasticity and trade-offs shape intra-specific variation in competitive response in a foundation tree species. New Phytol. 2020; 230(2):710-719. DOI: 10.1111/nph.17166. View

3.
Whitham T, Bailey J, Schweitzer J, Shuster S, Bangert R, LeRoy C . A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nat Rev Genet. 2006; 7(7):510-23. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1877. View

4.
Madritch M, Greene S, Lindroth R . Genetic mosaics of ecosystem functioning across aspen-dominated landscapes. Oecologia. 2009; 160(1):119-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1283-3. View

5.
Des Roches S, Post D, Turley N, Bailey J, Hendry A, Kinnison M . The ecological importance of intraspecific variation. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 2(1):57-64. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5. View