» Articles » PMID: 34507569

Does Laparoscopic Hysterectomy + bilateral Salpingectomy Decrease the Ovarian Reserve More Than Total Abdominal Hysterectomy? A Cohort Study, Measuring Anti-Müllerian Hormone Before and After Surgery

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Sep 11
PMID 34507569
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Decreased ovarian function and reserve is one of the complications of hysterectomy. In this study, we aimed to compare anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels between total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, serum levels of AMH were compared between the groups undergoing TAH + bilateral salpingectiomy and TLH, in 66 patients (33 in each group) who referred to the hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for hysterectomy during one years of work. The collected information included age, weight, gravidity, parity, regularity of menstrual cycle, uterine weight, blood loss during surgery, and serum levels of AMH before and 6 months after surgery, compared between groups.

Results: Most patients (88% in TAH and 73% in TLH group) aged 40-50 years. Mean age, weight, parity of patients was similar in both groups, while blood loss was significantly less in TLH group (P < 0.01). Median (IQR) of pre-surgical AMH values were 0.40 (0.55) ng/ml in the TLH group and 0.92 (1.23) ng/ml in the TAH group (P = 0.12) that decreased to 0.29 (0.44) ng/ml in the TLH group and 0.15 (0.31) ng/ml in the TAH group (P = 0.02). Also Median (IQR) of the difference between pre and post-surgical AMH values were 0.12 (0.31) and 0.58 (1.17) in TLH and TAH group, respectively (P = 0.003).

Conclusion: The serum levels of AMH decreased significantly after both methods of hysterectomy (laparoscopy and laparotomy), while this decrease was greater in TAH group that shows.

Citing Articles

The effect of coenzyme Q10 pretreatment on ovarian reserve in women undergoing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Micaraseth K, Tantanavipas S, Hongsakorn W, Singwongsa A Br J Nutr. 2024; 133(2):213-220.

PMID: 39648702 PMC: 11813623. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524003131.


The Impact of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review.

Radu T, Mar M, Tudorache V, Marginean C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38893008 PMC: 11173256. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113296.


The Effect of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve Using Two Different Electrosurgical Instruments: Ultrasonic Shears Versus Bipolar Electrocautery.

Zangmo R, Suresh G, Sarkar A, Ramu S, Roy K, Subramani K Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e59434.

PMID: 38826994 PMC: 11140537. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59434.


A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve and Function.

Gupta V, Agarwal S, Chaudhari P, Saxena N, Nimonkar S J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023; 73(1):62-68.

PMID: 36879936 PMC: 9984602. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-022-01709-9.

References
1.
OHanlan K, Dibble S, Garnier A, Reuland M . Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and complications of 830 cases. JSLS. 2007; 11(1):45-53. PMC: 3015816. View

2.
Tanprasertkul C, Ekarattanawong S, Sreshthaputra O, Vutyavanich T . Impact of hemostasis methods, electrocoagulation versus suture, in laparoscopic endometriotic cystectomy on the ovarian reserve: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014; 97 Suppl 8:S95-101. View

3.
Nahas E, Pontes A, Nahas-Neto J, Borges V, Dias R, Traiman P . Effect of total abdominal hysterectomy on ovarian blood supply in women of reproductive age. J Ultrasound Med. 2005; 24(2):169-74. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.2.169. View

4.
Ginsburg E, Benson C, Garfield J, Gleason R, Friedman A . The effect of operative technique and uterine size on blood loss during myomectomy: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 1993; 60(6):956-62. View

5.
Atabekoglu C, Taskin S, Kahraman K, Gemici A, Taskin E, Ozmen B . The effect of total abdominal hysterectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a pilot study. Climacteric. 2012; 15(4):393-7. DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2011.642426. View