» Articles » PMID: 34506909

Perfusion Parameters Derived from MRI for Preoperative Prediction of IDH Mutation and MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Glioblastomas

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34506909
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility for preoperative prediction of IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastomas(GBMs) by intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM) and dynamic susceptibility contrast(DSC).

Methods: Preoperative IVIM and DSC images of 71 patients(IDH mutation:45, IDH wildtype: 26; MGMT methylation: 31, MGMT unmethylation:40) with glioblastomas were analyzed retrospectively. Perfusion parameters including microcirculation perfusion coefficient(D*), perfusion fraction(f), cerebral blood volume(CBV) and cerebral blood flow(CBF) were measured. Corrected perfusion parameters containing corrected perfusion coefficient(ADC) and simplified perfusion fraction(SPF) were from the simplified IVIM with 3 b values. Correlations among parameters were analyzed by Spearman correlation. All parameters were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was analyzed.

Results: The IVIM parameters showed merely moderate correlations with CBV and showed no correlation with CBF. IDH mutation GBMs showed lower D*, ADC, SPF, CBV and higher f than IDH wildtype GBMs(all p < 0.05). D* was the independent predictor for IDH mutation with the highest AUC of 0.912(95%CI: 0.821-0.966). The D*, ADC, SPF and CBV of MGMT promoter methylation GBMs were lower than unmethylation GBMs while f was higher(all p < 0.05). Multivariate model showed the highest prediction efficacy for MGMT promoter methylation with an AUC of 0.915(95%CI: 0.824-0.968). The CBF was not useful in distinguishing IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation status(p = 0.055, 0.215).

Conclusion: IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation status in GBMs can be assessed effectively by IVIM and DSC. Besides, D* was the independent predictor of IDH mutation status.

Citing Articles

Research Progress on Glioma Microenvironment and Invasiveness Utilizing Advanced Multi-Parametric Quantitative MRI.

Song D, Fan G, Chang M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796702 PMC: 11719598. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010074.


VASARI 2.0: a new updated MRI VASARI lexicon to predict grading and status in brain glioma.

Negro A, Gemini L, Tortora M, Pace G, Iaccarino R, Marchese M Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1449982.

PMID: 39763601 PMC: 11700831. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1449982.


Distributed parameter model of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the identification of IDH mutation, 1p19q codeletion, and tumor cell proliferation in glioma patients.

Zhao K, Huang H, Gao E, Qi J, Chen T, Zhao G Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1333798.

PMID: 39525622 PMC: 11544007. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1333798.


Dynamic susceptibility contrast‑enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging parameters for predicting promoter methylation and prognostic value in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma.

Chida D, Okita Y, Utsugi R, Kuroda H, Hirayama R, Kijima N Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(6):610.

PMID: 39493435 PMC: 11528182. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14741.


Prediction of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma using MRI histogram analysis.

Liu X, Han T, Wang Y, Liu H, Zhou J Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):285.

PMID: 38907038 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02522-w.