» Articles » PMID: 34505042

Evolution of Antithrombotic Management of Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Over 10 Years and Guidelines Uptake

Overview
Journal CJC Open
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34505042
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The management of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (AF) patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF guidelines, last updated in 2020, seek to aid physicians in balancing both bleeding and thrombotic risks.

Methods: A tertiary academic centre registry of patients with AF who had PCI was examined for the antithrombotic therapy at discharge in 4 time periods (cohort 2010-2011; cohort 2014-2015; cohort 2017; cohort 2019). Discharge prescription patterns were compared among the cohorts, using the χ test. In addition, antithrombotic management in cohorts 2017 and 2019 were compared to guideline-expected therapy, using the χ test.

Results: A total of 576 AF patients undergoing PCI were included. Clinical and procedural characteristics were similar among cohorts, except for an increase in drug-eluting stent use in the most recent cohort (94% vs 99%;  = 0.04). The rate of oral anticoagulation increased over time (75% vs 89%; < 0.01), driven primarily by an increase in direct oral anticoagulants prescription (63% vs 84%; < 0.01). In contrast to previous cohorts, there was no significant difference between the observed and the guideline-expected anticoagulation rate in cohort 2019 (89% vs 94%;  = 0.23).

Conclusions: A combination of expert guidance and educational initiatives in the past decade contributed to dramatic changes in the management of patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Citing Articles

ANMCO position paper on antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing intracoronary stenting and/or acute coronary syndromes.

De Luca L, Rubboli A, Lettino M, Tubaro M, Leonardi S, Casella G Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022; 24(Suppl C):C254-C271.

PMID: 35663586 PMC: 9155223. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suac020.


Effect of New Evidence on Antithrombotic Therapies in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Alberta, Canada.

Eberhardt T, Bungard T, Graham M, Picard M, Wang G, Ackman M CJC Open. 2022; 4(4):378-382.

PMID: 35495861 PMC: 9039572. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.12.007.

References
1.
Rahman F, Kwan G, Benjamin E . Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016; 13(8):501. DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.114. View

2.
Lane D, Dagres N, Dan G, Garcia Seara J, Iliodromitis K, Lenarczyk R . Antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace. 2019; 21(7):1116-1125. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz033. View

3.
Hansen M, Sorensen R, Clausen M, Fog-Petersen M, Raunso J, Gadsboll N . Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(16):1433-41. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.271. View

4.
Kralev S, Schneider K, Lang S, Suselbeck T, Borggrefe M . Incidence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time coronary angiography. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e24964. PMC: 3177852. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024964. View

5.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B . 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(38):2893-2962. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. View