» Articles » PMID: 34504526

Surgery and Medical Treatment in Microprolactinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34504526
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Dopamine agonists (DAs) are recommended as the first-line treatment for prolactinomas; however, tumour recurrence after drug withdrawal remains a clinical problem. Recent studies have reported high remission rates via surgery in microprolactinomas. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical result of DA treatment with surgery as initial therapy in patients with treatment-naive microprolactinoma.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search for studies and reports regarding microprolactinoma patients treated with DAs and/or surgery published between January 1970 and November 2020 was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library). Clinical treatment outcome was evaluated by the biochemical remission of serum prolactin level to normal after treatment. The statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity. Pooled data were analysed according to a random effect model.

Results: Eighteen studies with 661 patients were included for analysis. The DA treatment group achieved a higher remission rate at ≥12 months follow-up (96% vs. 86%; =0.019). Surgery showed a higher remission rate than the DA treatment group after the treatment withdrawal (78% vs. 44%; =0.003). Patients with preoperative prolactin level of ≤200 ng/mL had a higher remission rate than patients with preoperative prolactin level of >200 ng/mL (92% vs. 40%; =0.029).

Conclusion: Surgery showed a high remission rate in treatment-naive microprolactinoma patients after treatment withdrawal and may be an alternative first-line treatment strategy in addition to DAs, particularly in patients with a preoperative prolactin level of ≤200 ng/mL.

Citing Articles

Gender Differences in Patients with Prolactinoma: Single-center Ukrainian Experience.

Voznyak O, Zinkevych I, Lytvynenko A, Hryniv N, Ilyuk R, Kobyliak N Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2024; 19(3):204-214.

PMID: 38561622 DOI: 10.2174/0115748871288948240325080936.


Prognostic factors for surgical treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Voznyak O, Zinkevych I, Lytvynenko A, Hryniv N, Ilyuk R, Kobyliak N Front Surg. 2024; 11:1283179.

PMID: 38375408 PMC: 10875013. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1283179.


Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement.

Petersenn S, Fleseriu M, Casanueva F, Giustina A, Biermasz N, Biller B Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023; 19(12):722-740.

PMID: 37670148 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5.


Update in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy of Prolactinoma.

Fukuhara N, Nishiyama M, Iwasaki Y Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(15).

PMID: 35892862 PMC: 9331865. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153604.


Implementation of functional imaging using C-methionine PET-CT co-registered with MRI for advanced surgical planning and decision making in prolactinoma surgery.

Bakker L, Verstegen M, Ghariq E, Verbist B, Schutte P, Bashari W Pituitary. 2022; 25(4):587-601.

PMID: 35616762 PMC: 9345807. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01230-2.


References
1.
Carija R, Tudor M, Vucina D . Effect of the preoperative use of dopamine agonists in the postoperative course of prolactinomas: a systematic review. Endocr Pract. 2013; 20(1):70-4. DOI: 10.4158/EP13165.RA. View

2.
Gillam M, Molitch M, Lombardi G, Colao A . Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev. 2006; 27(5):485-534. DOI: 10.1210/er.2005-9998. View

3.
Molitch M . Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas: A Review. JAMA. 2017; 317(5):516-524. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.19699. View

4.
Loyo-Varela M, Herrada-Pineda T, Revilla-Pacheco F, Manrique-Guzman S . Pituitary tumor surgery: review of 3004 cases. World Neurosurg. 2012; 79(2):331-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.06.024. View

5.
Newcombe R . Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998; 17(8):857-72. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::aid-sim777>3.0.co;2-e. View