» Articles » PMID: 34503460

Study Protocol for OptimalTTF-2: Enhancing Tumor Treating Fields with Skull Remodeling Surgery for First Recurrence Glioblastoma: a Phase 2, Multi-center, Randomized, Prospective, Interventional Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34503460
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: OptimalTTF-2 is a randomized, comparative, multi-center, investigator-initiated, interventional study aiming to test skull remodeling surgery in combination with Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) and best physicians choice medical oncological therapy for first recurrence in glioblastoma patients. OptimalTTF-2 is a phase 2 trial initiated in November 2020. Skull remodeling surgery consists of five burrholes, each 15 mm in diameter, directly over the tumor resection cavity. Preclinical research indicates that this procedure enhances the effect of Tumor Treating Fields considerably. We recently concluded a phase 1 safety/feasibility trial that indicated improved overall survival and no additional toxicity. This phase 2 trial aims to validate the efficacy of the proposed intervention.

Methods: The trial is designed as a comparative, 1:1 randomized, minimax two-stage phase 2 with an expected 70 patients to a maximum sample size of 84 patients. After 12-months follow-up of the first 52 patients, an interim futility analysis will be performed. The two trial arms will consist of either a) TTFields therapy combined with best physicians choice oncological treatment (control arm) or b) skull remodeling surgery, TTFields therapy and best practice oncology (interventional arm). Major eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, 1st recurrence of supratentorial glioblastoma, Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70, focal tumor, and lack of significant co-morbidity. Study design aims to detect a 20% increase in overall survival after 12 months (OS12), assuming OS12 = 40% in the control group and OS12 = 60% in the intervention group. Secondary endpoints include hazard rate ratio of overall survival and progression-free survival, objective tumor response rate, quality of life, KPS, steroid dose, and toxicity. Toxicity, objective tumor response rate, and QoL will be assessed every 3rd month. Endpoint data will be collected at the end of the trial, including the occurrence of suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs), unacceptable serious adverse events (SAEs), withdrawal of consent, or loss-to-follow-up.

Discussion: New treatment modalities are highly needed for first recurrence glioblastoma. Our proposed treatment modality of skull remodeling surgery, Tumor Treating Fields, and best practice medical oncological therapy may increase overall survival significantly.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0422399 , registered 13. January 2020.

Citing Articles

A Leadfield-Free Optimization Framework for Transcranially Applied Electric Currents.

Weise K, Madsen K, Worbs T, Knosche T, Korshoj A, Thielscher A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763744 PMC: 11702683. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.18.629095.


Tumor-treating fields dosimetry in glioblastoma: Insights into treatment planning, optimization, and dose-response relationships.

Mikic N, Gentilal N, Cao F, Lok E, Wong E, Ballo M Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae032.

PMID: 38560348 PMC: 10981464. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae032.


Efficacy of tumour-treating fields therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A narrative review of current evidence.

Olatunji G, Aderinto N, Adefusi T, Kokori E, Akinmoju O, Yusuf I Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(48):e36421.

PMID: 38050252 PMC: 10695547. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036421.


Enhancing glioblastoma treatment through the integration of tumor-treating fields.

Szklener K, Bilski M, Nieoczym K, Mandziuk D, Mandziuk S Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1274587.

PMID: 37916157 PMC: 10616854. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1274587.


Surgical outcomes and postoperative hemorrhage risk of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for deer horn shaped stones analyzed by Lasso regression.

Min S, Zhang W, Zhou J, Chen M, Zhao Z Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(9):5949-5958.

PMID: 37854230 PMC: 10579023.


References
1.
Ellingson B, Bendszus M, Boxerman J, Barboriak D, Erickson B, Smits M . Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(9):1188-98. PMC: 4588759. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov095. View

2.
Simon R . Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989; 10(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9. View

3.
Korshoej A, Mikic N, Hansen F, Saturnino G, Thielscher A, Bomzon Z . Enhancing Tumor Treating Fields Therapy with Skull-Remodeling Surgery. The Role of Finite Element Methods in Surgery Planning. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020; 2019:6995-6997. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856556. View

4.
Stupp R, Wong E, Kanner A, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V . NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(14):2192-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. View

5.
Mrugala M, Engelhard H, Tran D, Kew Y, Cavaliere R, Villano J . Clinical practice experience with NovoTTF-100A™ system for glioblastoma: The Patient Registry Dataset (PRiDe). Semin Oncol. 2014; 41 Suppl 6:S4-S13. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.010. View