» Articles » PMID: 34503264

Clinical Impact of Unexpected Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34503264
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Radiologically identified para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is contraindicated for pancreatic cancer (PC) surgery. There is no clinical consensus for unexpected intraoperative PALN enlargement. To analyze the prognostic role of unexpected PALN enlargement in resectable PC, we retrospectively reviewed data of 1953 PC patients in a single tertiary center. Patients with unexpected intraoperative PALN enlargement (group A1, negative pathology, = 59; group A2, positive pathology, = 13) showed median overall survival (OS) of 24.6 (95% CI: 15.2-33.2) and 13.0 (95% CI: 4.9-19.7) months, respectively. Patients with radiological PALN metastasis without other metastases (group B, = 91) showed median OS of 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.4-11.6). Compared with group A1, groups A2 and B had hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.79 (95% CI, 1.4-5.7) and 2.67 (95% CI: 1.8-4.0), respectively. Compared with group A2, group B had HR of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.5-1.9). Multivariable analysis also showed positive PALN as a negative prognostic factor (HR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.2-5.3), whereas positive regional lymph node did not (HR 1.32 95% CI: 0.8-2.3). Thus, unexpected malignant PALN has a negative prognostic impact comparable to radiological PALN metastasis. This results suggests prompt pathologic evaluation for unexpected PALN enlargements is needed and on-site modification of surgical strategy would be considered.

Citing Articles

Noninvasive prediction of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer using an ultrasound-based clinicoradiomics machine learning model.

Wen D, Chen J, Tang Z, Pang J, Qin Q, Zhang L Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):56.

PMID: 38890695 PMC: 11184715. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01259-3.


Impact of para aortic lymph node removal on survival following resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Sillesen M, Hansen C, Burgdorf S, Dencker E, Krohn P, Kollbeck S BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):214.

PMID: 37528360 PMC: 10394933. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02123-2.

References
1.
Cameron J, Riall T, Coleman J, Belcher K . One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(1):10-5. PMC: 1570590. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea. View

2.
Gemenetzis G, Groot V, Blair A, Laheru D, Zheng L, Narang A . Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgical Resection. Ann Surg. 2018; 270(2):340-347. PMC: 6985003. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002753. View

3.
Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, La Vecchia C, Johnson C, Biankin A . Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 2:16022. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.22. View

4.
Sperti C, Gruppo M, Blandamura S, Valmasoni M, Pozza G, Passuello N . Para-aortic node involvement is not an independent predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23(24):4399-4406. PMC: 5487503. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4399. View

5.
Nitecki S, Sarr M, Colby T, Van Heerden J . Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving?. Ann Surg. 1995; 221(1):59-66. PMC: 1234495. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00007. View