» Articles » PMID: 34501691

Increased Use of Porch or Backyard Nature During COVID-19 Associated with Lower Stress and Better Symptom Experience Among Breast Cancer Patients

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34501691
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contact with nature has been used to promote both physical and mental health, and is increasingly used among cancer patients. However, the COVID-19 pandemic created new challenges in both access to nature in public spaces and in cancer care. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the change in active and passive use of nature, places of engaging with nature and associations of nature contact with respect to improvements to perceived stress and symptom experience among breast cancer patients during the pandemic. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of people diagnosed with breast cancer using ResearchMatch ( = 56) in July 2020 (the first wave of COVID-19). In this US-based, predominantly white, affluent, highly educated, female sample, we found that, on average, participants were first diagnosed with breast cancer at 54 years old and at stage 2 or 3. Eighteen percent of participants experienced disruptions in their cancer care due to the pandemic. As expected, activities in public places significantly decreased as well, including use of parks/trails and botanical gardens. In contrast, spending time near home, on the porch or in the backyard significantly increased. Also observed were significant increases in indoor activities involving passive nature contact, such as watching birds through a window, listening to birdsong, and smelling rain or plants. Decreased usage of parks/trails was significantly associated with higher stress (Coef = -2.30, = 0.030) and increased usage of the backyard/porch was significantly associated with lower stress (Coef = -2.69, = 0.032), lower symptom distress (Coef = -0.80, = 0.063) and lower symptom severity (Coef = -0.52, = 0.009). The most commonly reported alternatives to outdoor engagement with nature were watching nature through a window (84%), followed by looking at images of nature (71%), and listening to nature through a window (66%). The least commonly enjoyed alternative was virtual reality of nature scenes (25%). While outdoor contact with nature away from home decreased, participants still found ways to experience the restorative benefits of nature in and around their home. Of special interest in planning interventions was the fact that actual or real nature was preferred over that experienced through technology. This could be an artifact of our sample, or could represent a desire to be in touch with the "real world" during a health crisis. Nature contact may represent a flexible strategy to decrease stress and improve symptom experience among patients with cancer, particularly during public health crises or disruptions to cancer care.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of Home and Neighborhood Built Environments During COVID-19 for Older Adults in the United States and Italy.

Anderson D, DeCaro R, Chadalavada M, Marin A, Di Crosta A, Ceccato I J Aging Environ. 2024; 2023:1-37.

PMID: 39055175 PMC: 11271746. DOI: 10.1080/26892618.2023.2269552.


Interactions with Nature, Good for the Mind and Body: A Narrative Review.

Stott D, Forde D, Sharma C, Deutsch J, Bruneau Jr M, Nasser J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(3).

PMID: 38541328 PMC: 10970260. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21030329.


Natural environments, psychosocial health, and health behaviors in a crisis - A scoping review of the literature in the COVID-19 context.

Nigg C, Petersen E, MacIntyre T J Environ Psychol. 2023; 88:102009.

PMID: 37065613 PMC: 10082968. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102009.


Nature-Based Interventions and Exposure among Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review.

Timko Olson E, Olson A, Driscoll M, Vermeesch A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767741 PMC: 9916332. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032376.


Nature's contributions in coping with a pandemic in the 21st century: A narrative review of evidence during COVID-19.

Labib S, Browning M, Rigolon A, Helbich M, James P Sci Total Environ. 2022; 833:155095.

PMID: 35395304 PMC: 8983608. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155095.


References
1.
Sahlin E, Ahlborg Jr G, Matuszczyk J, Grahn P . Nature-based stress management course for individuals at risk of adverse health effects from work-related stress-effects on stress related symptoms, workability and sick leave. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(6):6586-611. PMC: 4078597. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110606586. View

2.
Mao G, Cao Y, Lan X, He Z, Chen Z, Wang Y . Therapeutic effect of forest bathing on human hypertension in the elderly. J Cardiol. 2012; 60(6):495-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.08.003. View

3.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

4.
Morse J, Gladkikh T, Hackenburg D, Gould R . COVID-19 and human-nature relationships: Vermonters' activities in nature and associated nonmaterial values during the pandemic. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0243697. PMC: 7732125. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243697. View

5.
Olafsdottir G, Cloke P, Vogele C . Place, green exercise and stress: An exploration of lived experience and restorative effects. Health Place. 2017; 46:358-365. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.02.006. View