» Articles » PMID: 34499046

How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2021 Sep 9
PMID 34499046
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems for symptom monitoring in patients with cancer have shown quality of life and survival benefits in controlled trials. They are beginning to be used in routine oncology practice. Many software developers provide software solutions for clinicians, but how should clinicians decide which system to use? We propose a synthesis of the main questions regarding the effectiveness, safety, and functionality of an ePRO system that a clinician should ask software providers to assist in the selection of a software product in order to obtain the best value tools for their patients and their practice.

Citing Articles

A sociotechnical framework to assess patient-facing eHealth tools: results of a modified Delphi process.

Jacob C, Lindeque J, Muller R, Klein A, Metcalfe T, Connolly S NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):232.

PMID: 38102323 PMC: 10724255. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00982-w.


Psychosocial assessment practices for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a national survey study.

Wiener L, Sannes T, Randall J, Lahijana S, Applebaum A, Gray T Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023; 58(12):1314-1321.

PMID: 37634015 PMC: 10967240. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02087-0.


Monitoring health as an opportunity to categorize preventative and early-treatment actions in a self-care journey: our experience with a Healthcare Magenta Scorecard.

Moraes V, Pereira Silva R, Kawagoe C, Tavora P, Cassola N, Ferretti M Mhealth. 2023; 9:25.

PMID: 37492123 PMC: 10364010. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-22-56.


Psychosocial Assessment Practices for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A National Survey Study.

Wiener L, Sannes T, Randall J, Lahijani S, Applebaum A, Gray T Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 37461551 PMC: 10350176. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3044597/v1.


Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review.

Consolo L, Castellini G, Cilluffo S, Basile I, Lusignani M J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022; 6(1):102.

PMID: 36138279 PMC: 9500127. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z.


References
1.
Mackler E, Petersen L, Severson J, Blayney D, Benitez L, Early C . Implementing a Method for Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes Associated With Oral Oncolytic Therapy. J Oncol Pract. 2017; 13(4):e395-e400. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2016.018390. View

2.
Rowland S, Fitzgerald J, Holme T, Powell J, McGregor A . What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:4. PMC: 6957674. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x. View

3.
Barbera L, Sutradhar R, Seow H, Mittmann N, Howell D, Earle C . The impact of routine Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) use on overall survival in cancer patients: Results of a population-based retrospective matched cohort analysis. Cancer Med. 2020; 9(19):7107-7115. PMC: 7541161. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3374. View

4.
Berry D, Hong F, Halpenny B, Partridge A, Fann J, Wolpin S . Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 32(3):199-205. PMC: 3887477. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.6662. View

5.
Strasser F, Blum D, von Moos R, Cathomas R, Ribi K, Aebi S . The effect of real-time electronic monitoring of patient-reported symptoms and clinical syndromes in outpatient workflow of medical oncologists: E-MOSAIC, a multicenter cluster-randomized phase III study (SAKK 95/06). Ann Oncol. 2015; 27(2):324-32. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv576. View