» Articles » PMID: 34496821

An Open-label Randomized Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Posterior Laminoplasty in Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Study Design and Analysis Plan...

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2021 Sep 9
PMID 34496821
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In treating patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (COPLL), a novel surgery technique - anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) suggested promising clinical benefits in recent exploratory studies.

Methods: This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active controlled trial that will compare the clinical benefits of ACAF versus conventional posterior laminoplasty (LAMP) in severe COPLL patients. A total of 164 patients will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ACAF or LAMP group. The primary efficacy measure is cervical- Japanese Orthopaedic Association (C-JOA) recovery rate at 12 months post operation, which is to be derived by Hirabayashi's method from JOA data (range, 0 [worst] to 17 [normal condition]). Other important secondary efficacy endpoints include visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe]), 10-item neck disability index (NDI, a total range of 0 to 50 points, the highest index the worst) and 6-level Nurick disability grade (range, 0 [mild] to 5 [severe]). Safety endpoints including adverse events, perioperative complications, and adverse events of special interest will also be assessed in this study. Full analysis set for baseline and efficacy data analyses according to the intention-to-treat principle will be established as the primary analysis population. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to analyze the C-JOA recovery rate, with random stratification factors (if appropriate) and the treatment group as fixed factors, and the baseline level of C-JOA score as covariate.

Discussion: This study is designed to demonstrate the clinical benefits of ACAF as compared to conventional LAMP in COPLL patients. It will provide clinical evidence that the novel surgery technique - ACAF might be more favorable in treating patients with severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. (Words: 290).

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04968028 .

Citing Articles

Novel Algorithm for Surgical Management of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study With 2-Year Follow-Up.

Cai Z, Kang H, Quan L, Ren Y, Fang M, Tan Y Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(2):393-400.

PMID: 39530189 PMC: 11787990. DOI: 10.1111/os.14293.


Surgical options for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: a narrative review.

Sun N, Jiang C, Liu Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):707.

PMID: 39487441 PMC: 11531132. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05215-8.

References
1.
Cui L, Hung H, Wang S . Modification of sample size in group sequential clinical trials. Biometrics. 2001; 55(3):853-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00853.x. View

2.
Peto R, Pike M, Armitage P, Breslow N, Cox D, Howard S . Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. Br J Cancer. 1976; 34(6):585-612. PMC: 2025229. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1976.220. View

3.
Singh N, Shetty A, Jakkepally S, Kumarasamy D, Kanna R, Rajasekaran S . Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Spine and Its Association With Ossified Lesions in the Whole Spine: A Cross-Sectional Study of 2500 CT Scans. Global Spine J. 2021; 13(1):122-132. PMC: 9837524. DOI: 10.1177/2192568221993440. View

4.
Altman D, Bland J . Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ. 2005; 330(7495):843. PMC: 556084. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843. View

5.
Matsunaga S, Sakou T . Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(5):E309-14. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241ad33. View