» Articles » PMID: 34495962

Community Engagement in the Prevention and Control of COVID-19: Insights from Vietnam

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Sep 8
PMID 34495962
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Community engagement (CE) is an effective public health strategy for improving health outcomes. There is limited published knowledge about effective approaches to CE in ensuring effective responses to COVID-19 throughout lockdowns, travel restrictions and social distancing. In this paper, we contribute to bridging this gap by highlighting experience of CE in Vietnam, specifically focusing on migrant workers in Vietnam.

Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study design was used with qualitative data collection was carried out during August-October 2020. Two districts were purposefully selected from two large industrial zones. Data was collected using in-depth interviews (n = 36) with individuals and households, migrants and owners of dormitories, industrial zone factory representatives, community representatives and health authorities. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis approach. The study received ethics approval from the Hanoi University Institutional Review Board.

Results: The government's response to COVID-19 was spearheaded by the multi-sectoral National Steering Committee for the Prevention and Control of COVID-19, chaired by the Vice Prime Minister and comprised different members from 23 ministries. This structure was replicated throughout the province and local levels and all public and private organizations. Different activities were carried out by local communities, following four key principles of infection control: early detection, isolation, quarantine and hospitalization. We found three key determinants of engagement of migrant workers with COVID-19 prevention and control: availability of resources, appropriate capacity strengthening, transparent and continuous communication and a sense of trust in government legitimacy.

Discussion And Conclusion: Our results support the current literature on CE in infection control which highlights the importance of context and suggests that future CE should consider five key components: multi-sectoral collaboration with a whole-of-community approach to strengthen governance structures with context-specific partnerships; mobilization of resources and decentralization of decision making to encourage self-reliance and building of local capacity; capacity building through training and supervision to local institutions; transparent and clear communication of health risks and sensitization of local communities to improve compliance and foster trust in the government measures; and understanding the urgent needs ensuring of social security and engaging all parts of the community, specifically the vulnerable groups.

Citing Articles

Pandemic preparedness in Vietnam: a review of health system resilience and areas for improvement.

Tran B, Joarder T, Pang V, Carballo C, Do H, Nguyen C J Glob Health. 2025; 15():03001.

PMID: 39849947 PMC: 11758170. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.15.03001.


Role of social innovations in health in the prevention and control of infectious diseases: a scoping review.

Khazaee-Pool M, Pashaei T, Zarghani M, Ponnet K Infect Dis Poverty. 2024; 13(1):87.

PMID: 39563417 PMC: 11577845. DOI: 10.1186/s40249-024-01253-w.


Ethical Considerations in Infodemic Management: Systematic Scoping Review.

Germani F, Spitale G, Machiri S, Ho C, Ballalai I, Biller-Andorno N JMIR Infodemiology. 2024; 4:e56307.

PMID: 39208420 PMC: 11393515. DOI: 10.2196/56307.


How Ho Chi Minh City adapted its care pathway to manage the first large-scale community transmission of COVID-19.

Khue L, Khoa N, Duong V, Hien D, Otsu S, Quang P Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2023; 14(5 Spec edition):1-4.

PMID: 37969813 PMC: 10632600. DOI: 10.5365/wpsar.2023.14.5.1045.


Reversing the trend: a scoping review of health innovation transfer or exchange from low- and middle-income countries to high-income countries.

Ishimwe M, Kiplagat J, Kadam Knowlton A, Livinski A, Kupfer L BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(Suppl 7).

PMID: 37967892 PMC: 10660955. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013583.


References
1.
Loewenson R, Accoe K, Bajpai N, Buse K, Deivanayagam T, London L . Reclaiming comprehensive public health. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5(9). PMC: 7520813. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003886. View

2.
Chakraborty I, Maity P . COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 728:138882. PMC: 7175860. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882. View

3.
Eder M, Carter-Edwards L, Hurd T, Rumala B, Wallerstein N . A logic model for community engagement within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards consortium: can we measure what we model?. Acad Med. 2013; 88(10):1430-6. PMC: 3784628. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829b54ae. View

4.
Tung L, Thanh P . Survey data on government risk communication and citizen compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam. Data Brief. 2020; 33:106348. PMC: 7524451. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106348. View

5.
Baum F, Freeman T, Musolino C, Abramovitz M, Ceukelaire W, Flavel J . Explaining covid-19 performance: what factors might predict national responses?. BMJ. 2021; 372:n91. PMC: 7842256. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n91. View