» Articles » PMID: 34494329

Effect of Posture and Body Weight Loading on Spinal Posterior Root Reflex Responses

Overview
Journal Eur J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Sep 8
PMID 34494329
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The posterior root muscle response (PRM) is a monosynaptic reflex that is evoked by single pulse transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS). The main aim of this work was to analyse how body weight loading influences PRM reflex threshold measured from several lower limb muscles in healthy participants. PRM reflex responses were evoked with 1-ms rectangular monophasic pulses applied at an interval of 6 s via a self-adhesive electrode (9 × 5 cm) at the T11-T12 vertebral level. Surface electromyographic activity of lower limb muscles was recorded during four different conditions, one in decubitus supine (DS) and the other three involving standing at 100%, 50%, and 0% body weight loading (BW). PRM threshold intensity, peak-to-peak amplitude, and latency for each muscle were analysed in different conditions study. PRM reflex threshold increased with body weight unloading compared with DS, and the largest change was observed between DS and 0% BW for the proximal muscles and between DS and 50% BW for distal muscles. Peak-to-peak amplitude analysis showed only a significant mean decrease of 34.6% (SD 10.4, p = 0.028) in TA and 53.6% (SD 15.1, p = 0.019) in GM muscles between DS and 50% BW. No significant differences were observed for PRM latency. This study has shown that sensorimotor networks can be activated with tSCS in various conditions of body weight unloading. Higher stimulus intensities are necessary to evoke reflex response during standing at 50% body weight loading. These results have practical implications for gait rehabilitation training programmes that include body weight support.

Citing Articles

Optimizing transcutaneous spinal stimulation: excitability of evoked spinal reflexes is dependent on electrode montage.

Thatcher K, Nielsen K, Sandler E, Daliet 4th O, Iddings J, Field-Fote E J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):2.

PMID: 39762915 PMC: 11702053. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01524-5.


Optimizing Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation: Excitability of Evoked Spinal Reflexes is Dependent on Electrode Montage.

Thatcher K, Nielsen K, Sandler E, Daliet O, Iddings J, Field-Fote E Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39149487 PMC: 11326363. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4719031/v1.


Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Periodic Limb Movements During Sleep: A Large Multicenter Study.

Soh J, Kang Y, Yoon W, Park C, Shin H Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 17(3):217-225.

PMID: 38693650 PMC: 11375175. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2024.00034.


Distinguishing reflex from non-reflex responses elicited by transcutaneous spinal stimulation targeting the lumbosacral cord in healthy individuals.

Gordineer E, Stokic D, Krenn M Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(4):959-970.

PMID: 38416179 PMC: 10973043. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06790-2.


Transcutaneous spinal stimulation in people with and without spinal cord injury: Effect of electrode placement and trains of stimulation on threshold intensity.

Finn H, Bye E, Elphick T, Boswell-Ruys C, Gandevia S, Butler J Physiol Rep. 2023; 11(11):e15692.

PMID: 37269156 PMC: 10238786. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15692.