» Articles » PMID: 34488504

Using the Delphi Technique to Achieve Consensus on Bereavement Care in Palliative Care in Europe: An EAPC White Paper

Overview
Journal Palliat Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2021 Sep 7
PMID 34488504
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The WHO definition of palliative care includes bereavement support as integral to palliative care, yet a previous survey of bereavement support in palliative care in Europe has shown a range of service responses to loss. A rigorous approach to agreeing and implementing a palliative care bereavement framework was required.

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop consensus on best-practice recommendations for bereavement care principles, structures, processes and delivery based on current practice and evidence.

Design: In accordance with Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies, a consensus-building five-round Delphi technique was performed. A scoping review of research literature informed drafting of 54 statements by the EAPC Bereavement Task Force. Evaluation of the statements was performed by an expert panel using a 5-point Likert scale. ⩾80% agreement were defined as essential items and 75%-79% agreement were defined as desirable items. Items with a consensus rating <75% were revised during the process.

Setting/participants: The Delphi study was carried out by an expert panel among membership organisations of the European Association for Palliative Care.

Results: In total, 376 email requests to complete Delphi questionnaire were distributed with a response rate of 23% ( = 87) and a follow-up response-rate of 79% ( = 69). Of the initial 54 statements in six dimensions, 52 statements were endorsed with 26 essential statements and 26 desirable statements.

Conclusions: The six dimensions and 52 statements agreed through this Delphi study clarify a coherent direction for development of bereavement services in palliative care in Europe.

Citing Articles

Evidence adaptation and tailored implementation of family bereavement support in specialised palliative care: A multi-method study.

Kohler M, Thaqi Q, Kuske S, Schwalbach T, Riguzzi M, Naef R Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025; 8:100305.

PMID: 40028416 PMC: 11869003. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100305.


'A good ending but not the end': Exploring family preparations surrounding a relative's death and the Afterlife - A qualitative study.

Liang H, Xiong Q, Lin P, Tsai J, Preston N Palliat Med. 2024; 38(10):1184-1193.

PMID: 39340161 PMC: 11613525. DOI: 10.1177/02692163241280016.


Aftercare Provision for Bereaved Relatives Following Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Among Physicians.

Renckens S, Pasman H, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B Int J Public Health. 2024; 69:1607346.

PMID: 39119216 PMC: 11306013. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607346.


End-of-life and bereavement support to families in cancer care: a cross-sectional survey with bereaved family members.

Thaqi Q, Riguzzi M, Blum D, Peng-Keller S, Lorch A, Naef R BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):155.

PMID: 38303007 PMC: 10832212. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10575-2.


Taiwanese family members' bereavement experience following an expected death: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Liang H, Xiong Q, Remawi B, Preston N BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):14.

PMID: 38212776 PMC: 10782629. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01344-3.