» Articles » PMID: 34488425

Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques

Overview
Journal Bone Joint Res
Date 2021 Sep 7
PMID 34488425
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Outcomes following different types of surgical intervention for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are well reported individually but comparative data are deficient. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis to analyze the outcomes following surgical management of FAI by hip arthroscopy (HA), anterior mini open approach (AMO), and surgical hip dislocation (SHD). This SR was registered with PROSPERO. An electronic database search of PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE for English and German language articles over the last 20 years was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We specifically analyzed and compared changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), α-angle, rate of complications, rate of revision, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 48 articles were included for final analysis with a total of 4,384 hips in 4,094 patients. All subgroups showed a significant correction in mean α angle postoperatively with a mean change of 28.8° (95% confidence interval (CI) 21 to 36.5; p < 0.01) after AMO, 21.1° (95% CI 15.1 to 27; p < 0.01) after SHD, and 20.5° (95% CI 16.1 to 24.8; p < 0.01) after HA. The AMO group showed a significantly higher increase in PROMs (3.7; 95% CI 3.2 to 4.2; p < 0.01) versus arthroscopy (2.5; 95% CI 2.3 to 2.8; p < 0.01) and SHD (2.4; 95% CI 1.5 to 3.3; p < 0.01). However, the rate of complications following AMO was significantly higher than HA and SHD. All three surgical approaches offered significant improvements in PROMs and radiological correction of cam deformities. All three groups showed similar rates of revision procedures but SHD had the highest rate of conversion to a THA. Revision rates were similar for all three revision procedures.

Citing Articles

Current understanding of articular cartilage lesions in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Li Z, Yu J, An P, Zhang W, Tian K J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):886.

PMID: 39734214 PMC: 11684245. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05322-6.


No Effect of Cigarette Smoking in the Outcome of Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Lucenti L, Maffulli N, Bardazzi T, Pipino G, Pappalardo G, Migliorini F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685673 PMC: 11642028. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237214.


The pandemic is gone but its consequences are here to stay: avascular necrosis following corticosteroids administration for severe COVID-19.

Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Shukla T, DAmbrosi R, Singla M, Vaish A J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):135.

PMID: 38347592 PMC: 10860242. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04556-8.


Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of Os Acetabuli.

Yoshitani J, Schoyer B, Shah A, Khanduja V Int Orthop. 2024; 48(3):657-666.

PMID: 38195946 PMC: 10901947. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-06078-0.


Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies.

Dantas P, Goncalves S, Grenho A, Mascarenhas V, Martins J, Tavares da Silva M Bone Joint Res. 2023; 12(12):712-721.

PMID: 38043570 PMC: 10693937. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.1212.BJR-2022-0461.R2.


References
1.
Murata Y, Uchida S, Utsunomiya H, Hatakeyama A, Nakamura E, Sakai A . A Comparison of Clinical Outcome Between Athletes and Nonathletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Clin J Sport Med. 2017; 27(4):349-356. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000367. View

2.
Thomee R, Jonasson P, Thorborg K, Sansone M, Ahlden M, Thomee C . Cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish and validation of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with hip and groin disability due to femoro-acetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 22(4):835-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2721-7. View

3.
Larson C, Giveans M, Stone R . Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: mean 3.5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(5):1015-21. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511434578. View

4.
Nakano N, Lisenda L, Jones T, Loveday D, Khanduja V . Complications following arthroscopic surgery of the hip: a systematic review of 36 761 cases. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(12):1577-1583. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0043.R2. View

5.
Botser I, Smith Jr T, Nasser R, Domb B . Open surgical dislocation versus arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison of clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(2):270-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.11.008. View