Central Post-Stroke Pain: An Integrative Review of Somatotopic Damage, Clinical Symptoms, and Neurophysiological Measures
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The physiopathology of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is poorly understood, which may contribute to the limitations of diagnostic and therapeutic advancements. Thus, the current systematic review was conducted to examine, from an integrated perspective, the cortical neurophysiological changes observed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), focusing on the structural damage, and clinical symptoms in patients with CPSP. The literature review included the databases EMBASE, PubMed, and ScienceDirect using the following search terms by MeSH or Entree descriptors: [("Cerebral Stroke") AND ("Pain" OR "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation") AND ("Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation")] (through September 29, 2020). A total of 297 articles related to CPSP were identified. Of these, only four quantitatively recorded cortical measurements. We found four studies with different methodologies and results of the TMS measures. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, two studies had low methodological quality and the other two studies had satisfactory methodological quality. The four studies compared the motor threshold (MT) of the stroke-affected hemisphere with the unaffected hemisphere or with healthy controls. Two studies assessed other cortical excitability measures, such as cortical silent period (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). The main limitations in the interpretation of the results were the heterogeneity in parameter measurements, unknown cortical excitability measures as potential prognostic markers, the lack of a control group without pain, and the absence of consistent and validated diagnosis criteria. Despite the limited number of studies that prevented us from conducting a meta-analysis, the dataset of this systematic review provides evidence to improve the understanding of CPSP physiopathology. Additionally, these studies support the construction of a framework for diagnosis and will help improve the methodological quality of future research in somatosensory sequelae following stroke. Furthermore, they offer a way to integrate dysfunctional neuroplasticity markers that are indirectly assessed by neurophysiological measures with their correlated clinical symptoms.
Neuroimage Signature in Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review.
Buzhanskyy A, Duarte I, Patto A, Donato H, Castelo-Branco M, Abejas A Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025; 29(1):43.
PMID: 39885090 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01339-y.
Advancements in Modern Treatment Approaches for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Narrative Review.
Asadauskas A, Stieger A, Luedi M, Andereggen L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).
PMID: 39336863 PMC: 11432561. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185377.
Contributions of neuroimaging in central poststroke pain: a review.
Lemos M, Barbosa L, Ciampi de Andrade D, Lucato L Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024; 82(9):1-11.
PMID: 39216489 PMC: 11500300. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789225.
Rajamanickam G, Lee A, Liao P Neurochem Res. 2024; 49(9):2303-2318.
PMID: 38856889 DOI: 10.1007/s11064-024-04175-z.
Cingulotomy: the last man standing in the battle against medically refractory poststroke pain.
Kollenburg L, Kurt E, Arnts H, Vinke S Pain Rep. 2024; 9(2):e1149.
PMID: 38529477 PMC: 10962879. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001149.