» Articles » PMID: 34480657

Exploration of Predictors of Benefit from Nivolumab Monotherapy for Patients with Pretreated Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Post Hoc Subanalysis from the ATTRACTION-2 Study

Abstract

Background: The phase 3 ATTRACTION-2 study demonstrated that nivolumab monotherapy was superior to placebo for patients with pretreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, but early progression of tumors in some patients was of concern.

Methods: This post hoc analysis statistically explored the baseline characteristics of the ATTRACTION-2 patients and extracted a single-factor and double-factor combinations associated with early disease progression or early death. In the extracted patient subgroups, the 3-year restricted mean survival times of progression-free survival and overall survival were compared between the nivolumab and placebo arms.

Results: Two single factors (age and peritoneal metastasis) were extracted as independent predictors of early progression, but none of them, as a single factor, stratified patients into two subgroups with significant differences in restricted mean survival time. In contrast, two double-factor combinations (serum sodium level and white blood cell count; serum sodium level and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio) stratifying patients into two subgroups with significant differences in the restricted mean survival time were extracted. Additional exploratory analysis of a triple-factor combination showed that patients aged < 60 years with peritoneal metastasis and low serum sodium levels (approximately 7% of all patients) might receive less benefit from nivolumab, and patients aged ≥ 60 years with no peritoneal metastasis and normal serum sodium levels might receive higher benefit.

Conclusions: A combination of age, peritoneal metastasis, and serum sodium level might predict benefit from nivolumab as salvage therapy in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients, especially less benefit for patients having all three risk factors.

Citing Articles

Investigating the role of immunotherapy for real-world patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer between 2011 and 2023.

Shimozaki K, Ooki A, Yoshino K, Tamba M, Udagawa S, Osumi H Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025; 17:17588359251322670.

PMID: 40012706 PMC: 11863253. DOI: 10.1177/17588359251322670.


The real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

Liu Y, Tsai M, Liu T, Liu Y, Lin Y, Yeh C BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1325.

PMID: 39468513 PMC: 11520062. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13066-z.


Clinical outcomes and biomarker exploration of first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low PD-L1-expressing of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Sun Y, Lu S, Lai M, Yang X, Guan W, Yang L Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2024; 73(8):144.

PMID: 38832979 PMC: 11150231. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-024-03721-6.


Functional remodeling of intraperitoneal macrophages by oncolytic adenovirus restores anti-tumor immunity for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer.

Tabuchi M, Kikuchi S, Tazawa H, Okura T, Ogawa T, Mitsui E Mol Ther Oncol. 2024; 32(2):200806.

PMID: 38745748 PMC: 11090911. DOI: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200806.


Real-world outcomes of third-line immune checkpoint inhibitors versus irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a Korean, multicenter study (KCSG ST22-06).

Lim S, Lee K, Kim J, Im H, Kim I, Han H BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):252.

PMID: 38395832 PMC: 10885390. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11972-w.


References
1.
Darabi S, Braxton D, Eisenberg B, Demeure M . Predictive Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Response Beyond PD-1/PD-L1. Oncology (Williston Park). 2020; 34(8):321-327. DOI: 10.46883/ONC.2020.3408.0321. View

2.
Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, Shah M, Shapira-Frommer R, Nakagawa K . Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(10):1353-1365. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30445-9. View

3.
Robert C . A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):3801. PMC: 7393098. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17670-y. View

4.
Marrone K, Ying W, Naidoo J . Immune-Related Adverse Events From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 100(3):242-51. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.394. View

5.
Davis A, Patel V . The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker: an analysis of all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2019; 7(1):278. PMC: 6815032. DOI: 10.1186/s40425-019-0768-9. View