The Influence of Semantic Relevance on the Discernment of Product Appearance and Function

Overview

Journal BMC Psychol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Psychology

Date 2021 Sep 4

PMID 34479637

Citations 2

Authors

Ching-Yi Wang

Yu-Er Lin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the impact of semantic relevance on the ability to comprehend the appearance and function of a product, as presented in images.

Methods: The images used the constructs of Simile, Metaphor and Analogy to correspond to congruent, related and incongruent semantic structures, and measured the amplitude of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to compare these images with Landscape images. Sixteen participants with design-related educational backgrounds were invited to join in the ERP experiment.

Results: The results found that the image depicting the Metaphor showed a stronger N600 amplitude in the right anterior region of the brain than the Landscape image and the Analogy image induced a stronger N600 effect in the left anterior and right anterior part of the brain than the Landscape image. However, the Simile image did not trigger the N600. The N600 was triggered when the meaning of the Metaphor and Analogy being presented could not be understood. This indicates that a greater processing effort to comprehend them than was required for Simile. Analogy has a wider N600 distribution than Metaphor in the anterior area, suggesting that Analogy would require higher-level thinking processes and more complex semantic processing mechanisms than Metaphor.

Conclusions: The N600 implicated that an assessment method to detect the semantic relationship between appearance and function of a product would assist in determining whether a symbol was suitable to be associated with a product.

Citing Articles

Language switching is modulated by emotion priming: evidence from behavioral and event-related potentials study.

Wang Y, Liu X, Liu D, Zhu C Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1373636.

PMID: 39687565 PMC: 11647216. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1373636.

Temporal Electroencephalography Traits Dissociating Tactile Information and Cross-Modal Congruence Effects.

Ozawa Y, Yoshimura N Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(1).

PMID: 38202907 PMC: 10780639. DOI: 10.3390/s24010045.

References

Samson A, Zysset S, Huber O . Cognitive humor processing: different logical mechanisms in nonverbal cartoons--an fMRI study. Soc Neurosci. 2008; 3(2):125-40. DOI: 10.1080/17470910701745858. View

Hamm J, Johnson B, Kirk I . Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113(8):1339-50. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00161-x. View

Riegel M, Zurawski L, Wierzba M, Moslehi A, Klocek L, Horvat M . Characterization of the Nencki Affective Picture System by discrete emotional categories (NAPS BE). Behav Res Methods. 2015; 48(2):600-12. PMC: 4891391. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0620-1. View

Picton T, Bentin S, Berg P, Donchin E, Hillyard S, Johnson Jr R . Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(2):127-52. View

Qiu J, Li H, Chen A, Zhang Q . The neural basis of analogical reasoning: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 46(12):3006-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.008. View

Schmidt G, Seger C . Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain Cogn. 2009; 71(3):375-86. PMC: 2783884. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001. View

Gentner D, Forbus K . Computational models of analogy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015; 2(3):266-276. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.105. View

Jani N, Levine D . A neural network theory of proportional analogy-making. Neural Netw. 2000; 13(2):149-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(99)00106-9. View

DiCarlo J, Zoccolan D, Rust N . How does the brain solve visual object recognition?. Neuron. 2012; 73(3):415-34. PMC: 3306444. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010. View

10.

Guerra S, Ibanez A, Martin M, Bobes M, Reyes A, Mendoza R . N400 deficits from semantic matching of pictures in probands and first-degree relatives from multiplex schizophrenia families. Brain Cogn. 2009; 70(2):221-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.004. View

11.

Coulson S, Kutas M . Getting it: human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neurosci Lett. 2001; 316(2):71-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02387-4. View

12.

Marchewka A, Zurawski L, Jednorog K, Grabowska A . The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 46(2):596-610. PMC: 4030128. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1. View

13.

Bobes M, Lei Z, Ibanez S, Yi H, Valdes-Sosa M . Semantic matching of pictures in schizophrenia: a cross-cultural ERP study. Biol Psychiatry. 1996; 40(3):189-202. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00352-5. View

14.

Michalowski J, Drozdziel D, Matuszewski J, Koziejowski W, Jednorog K, Marchewka A . The Set of Fear Inducing Pictures (SFIP): Development and validation in fearful and nonfearful individuals. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 49(4):1407-1419. PMC: 5541104. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0797-y. View

15.

Coulson S, Van Petten C . Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Mem Cognit. 2002; 30(6):958-68. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195780. View

16.

Ortiz M, Grima Murcia M, Fernandez E . Brain processing of visual metaphors: An electrophysiological study. Brain Cogn. 2017; 113:117-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.005. View

17.

Pobric G, Mashal N, Faust M, Lavidor M . The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 20(1):170-81. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20005. View

18.

Shackman A, McMenamin B, Slagter H, Maxwell J, Greischar L, Davidson R . Electromyogenic artifacts and electroencephalographic inferences. Brain Topogr. 2009; 22(1):7-12. PMC: 2712576. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-009-0079-4. View

19.

Lai V, van Dam W, Conant L, Binder J, Desai R . Familiarity differentially affects right hemisphere contributions to processing metaphors and literals. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:44. PMC: 4322727. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00044. View

20.

Chan Y, Chou T, Chen H, Yeh Y, Lavallee J, Liang K . Towards a neural circuit model of verbal humor processing: an fMRI study of the neural substrates of incongruity detection and resolution. Neuroimage. 2012; 66:169-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.019. View