» Articles » PMID: 34471971

Preliminary Validation of the Apraxia Battery for Adults-second Edition (ABA-2) in Greek Patients with Dementia

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Sep 2
PMID 34471971
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Apraxia is considered a supportive feature in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. It has been reported that patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) may present apraxia, especially in the buccofacial area. The Apraxia Battery for Adults (ABA-2) is a brief and practical battery for praxis impairment and has been validated in Greek post-stroke patients.

Aim: To validate and evaluate ABA-2 test, translated and culturally adapted, in a sample of Greek demented patients.

Patients And Methods: Patients diagnosed with FTD (n = 20) and AD (n = 20) were included in the study. Age-, gender-, and education- matched healthy controls (n = 20) were also tested. All participants completed Adenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), Frontal Rating Scale (FRS), Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI), and ABA-2 battery. Sensitivity and specificity of ABA-2 were calculated, as well as its consistency and statistical significance for diagnosing apraxia.

Results: The ABA-2 was able to differentiate demented patients from healthy controls with a sensitivity of 77.5% and specificity of 95%. Its validity was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha coefficient > 0.7, indicating satisfactory internal reliability. Statistically significant differences were found when comparing total ABA-2 score (p < 0.0001), as well as 3 out of 6 subtests of ABA-2, between the two study groups. Age, gender and education were not correlated with ABA-2 score.

Conclusion: ABA-2 is a valid, reliable and sensitive battery to differentiate demented patients from healthy individuals in the Greek population. We propose the modification of ABA-2 to a 5-subtest tool, to be administered as a bed-side test.

Citing Articles

Assessment and treatment of gesture in neurogenic communication disorders: An international survey of practice.

Caute A, Roper A, Dipper L, Stark B Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024; 60(1):e13136.

PMID: 39584407 PMC: 11607673. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.13136.


An international core outcome set for primary progressive aphasia (COS-PPA): Consensus-based recommendations for communication interventions across research and clinical settings.

Volkmer A, Alves E, Bar-Zeev H, Barbieri E, Battista P, Beales A Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 21(1):e14362.

PMID: 39535361 PMC: 11781257. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14362.


Apraxia Patterns for the Differentiation between Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Variants.

Papadopoulos G, Parissis D, Gotzamani-Psarrakou A, Ioannidis P Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(3).

PMID: 38541161 PMC: 10971984. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60030435.


Normative Values for Word Syllable Duration With Interpretation in a Large Sample of Stroke Survivors With Aphasia.

Haley K, Jacks A, Kim S, Rodriguez M, Johnson L Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023; 32(5S):2480-2492.

PMID: 37595782 PMC: 10721249. DOI: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00300.

References
1.
Lam B, Masellis M, Freedman M, Stuss D, Black S . Clinical, imaging, and pathological heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease syndrome. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013; 5(1):1. PMC: 3580331. DOI: 10.1186/alzrt155. View

2.
Weder N, Aziz R, Wilkins K, Tampi R . Frontotemporal dementias: a review. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 6:15. PMC: 1906781. DOI: 10.1186/1744-859X-6-15. View

3.
Lewis J . Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist. 2006; 12(3):211-31. DOI: 10.1177/1073858406288327. View

4.
Park J . Apraxia: Review and Update. J Clin Neurol. 2017; 13(4):317-324. PMC: 5653618. DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2017.13.4.317. View

5.
Botha H, Duffy J, Strand E, Machulda M, Whitwell J, Josephs K . Nonverbal oral apraxia in primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. Neurology. 2014; 82(19):1729-35. PMC: 4032207. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000412. View