» Articles » PMID: 34461229

Health Technology Assessment for Cardiovascular Digital Health Technologies and Artificial Intelligence: Why Is It Different?

Overview
Journal Can J Cardiol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Aug 30
PMID 34461229
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Innovations in health care are growing exponentially, resulting in improved quality of and access to care, as well as rising societal costs of care and variable reimbursement. In recent years, digital health technologies and artificial intelligence have become of increasing interest in cardiovascular medicine owing to their unique ability to empower patients and to use increasing quantities of data for moving toward personalised and precision medicine. Health technology assessment agencies evaluate the money spent on a health care intervention or technology to attain a given clinical impact and make recommendations for reimbursement considerations. However, there is a scarcity of economic evaluations of cardiovascular digital health technologies and artificial intelligence. The current health technology assessment framework is not equipped to address the unique, dynamic, and unpredictable value considerations of these technologies and highlight the need to better approach the digital health technologies and artificial intelligence health technology assessment process. In this review, we compare digital health technologies and artificial intelligence with traditional health care technologies, review existing health technology assessment frameworks, and discuss challenges and opportunities related to cardiovascular digital health technologies and artificial intelligence health technology assessment. Specifically, we argue that health technology assessments for digital health technologies and artificial intelligence applications must allow for a much shorter device life cycle, given the rapid and even potentially continuously iterative nature of this technology, and thus an evidence base that maybe less mature, compared with traditional health technologies and interventions.

Citing Articles

AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Jacob C, Brasier N, Laurenzi E, Heuss S, Mougiakakou S, Coltekin A J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e67485.

PMID: 39909417 PMC: 11840377. DOI: 10.2196/67485.


Is health technology assessment ready for generative pretrained transformer large language models? Report of a fishbowl inquiry.

Goodman C, Treloar E Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024; 40(1):e48.

PMID: 39498482 PMC: 11569908. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462324000382.


Unleashing the potential: the imperative of political support for health technology assessment in Iran.

Aryankhesal A, Behzadifar M, Bakhtiari A, Azari S, Behzadifar M Health Econ Rev. 2024; 14(1):84.

PMID: 39378013 PMC: 11460068. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00563-x.


Ethical Concerns for Remote Computer Perception in Cardiology: New Stages for Digital Health Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning.

Kostick-Quenet K, Estep J, Blumenthal-Barby J Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024; 17(5):e010717.

PMID: 38771912 PMC: 11115370. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010717.


Developing a Program Costs Checklist of Digital Health Interventions: A Scoping Review and Empirical Case Study.

Khan Z, Kidholm K, Pedersen S, Haga S, Drozd F, Sundrehagen T Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(6):663-678.

PMID: 38530596 PMC: 11126496. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01366-y.