» Articles » PMID: 34460557

Fully 3D Active Surface with Machine Learning for PET Image Segmentation

Overview
Journal J Imaging
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Aug 30
PMID 34460557
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to tackle three-dimensional tumor volume reconstruction from Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images, most of the existing algorithms rely on the segmentation of independent PET slices. To exploit cross-slice information, typically overlooked in these 2D implementations, I present an algorithm capable of achieving the volume reconstruction directly in 3D, by leveraging an active surface algorithm. The evolution of such surface performs the segmentation of the whole stack of slices simultaneously and can handle changes in topology. Furthermore, no artificial stop condition is required, as the active surface will naturally converge to a stable topology. In addition, I include a machine learning component to enhance the accuracy of the segmentation process. The latter consists of a forcing term based on classification results from a discriminant analysis algorithm, which is included directly in the mathematical formulation of the energy function driving surface evolution. It is worth noting that the training of such a component requires minimal data compared to more involved deep learning methods. Only eight patients (i.e., two lung, four head and neck, and two brain cancers) were used for training and testing the machine learning component, while fifty patients (i.e., 10 lung, 25 head and neck, and 15 brain cancers) were used to test the full 3D reconstruction algorithm. Performance evaluation is based on the same dataset of patients discussed in my previous work, where the segmentation was performed using the 2D active contour. The results confirm that the active surface algorithm is superior to the active contour algorithm, outperforming the earlier approach on all the investigated anatomical districts with a dice similarity coefficient of 90.47 ± 2.36% for lung cancer, 88.30 ± 2.89% for head and neck cancer, and 90.29 ± 2.52% for brain cancer. Based on the reported results, it can be claimed that the migration into a 3D system yielded a practical benefit justifying the effort to rewrite an existing 2D system for PET imaging segmentation.

Citing Articles

Segmentation of Dynamic Total-Body [F]-FDG PET Images Using Unsupervised Clustering.

Jaakkola M, Rantala M, Jalo A, Saari T, Hentila J, Helin J Int J Biomed Imaging. 2023; 2023:3819587.

PMID: 38089593 PMC: 10715853. DOI: 10.1155/2023/3819587.


Accelerating 3D Medical Image Segmentation by Adaptive Small-Scale Target Localization.

Shirokikh B, Shevtsov A, Dalechina A, Krivov E, Kostjuchenko V, Golanov A J Imaging. 2021; 7(2).

PMID: 34460634 PMC: 8321270. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7020035.


Lung Segmentation on High-Resolution Computerized Tomography Images Using Deep Learning: A Preliminary Step for Radiomics Studies.

Comelli A, Coronnello C, Dahiya N, Benfante V, Palmucci S, Basile A J Imaging. 2021; 6(11).

PMID: 34460569 PMC: 8321165. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging6110125.


Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Zhang Y, Gorriz J, Dong Z J Imaging. 2021; 7(4).

PMID: 34460524 PMC: 8321330. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7040074.


Automatic Segmentation of Mandible from Conventional Methods to Deep Learning-A Review.

Qiu B, van der Wel H, Kraeima J, Glas H, Guo J, Borra R J Pers Med. 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34357096 PMC: 8307673. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11070629.


References
1.
Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura D . A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images. Comput Biol Med. 2014; 50:76-96. PMC: 4060809. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.04.014. View

2.
Gillies R, Kinahan P, Hricak H . Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2015; 278(2):563-77. PMC: 4734157. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. View

3.
Comelli A, Stefano A, Russo G, Sabini M, Ippolito M, Bignardi S . A smart and operator independent system to delineate tumours in Positron Emission Tomography scans. Comput Biol Med. 2018; 102:1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.09.002. View

4.
Wahl R, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge M . From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009; 50 Suppl 1:122S-50S. PMC: 2755245. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307. View

5.
Niyazi M, Landrock S, Elsner A, Manapov F, Hacker M, Belka C . Automated biological target volume delineation for radiotherapy treatment planning using FDG-PET/CT. Radiat Oncol. 2013; 8:180. PMC: 3722117. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-180. View