» Articles » PMID: 34457449

The Impact of Communication Strategies on Faculty Members' Readiness for Curricular Change

Overview
Journal Med Sci Educ
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 Aug 30
PMID 34457449
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Curricular change is the "new normal" for medical schools. Assessing faculty readiness, perceptions about the necessity and urgency of change, and confidence in the capacity of the organization to successfully implement the process, have been identified as essential to managing the curricular change process. We used The Medical School's Organizational Readiness for Curriculum Change Questionnaire (MORC) to assess and monitor faculty readiness for change. This 53-item survey uses a 5-point Likert scale to assess 3 factors. This project focused on the seven-item Communication subscale in order to guide the strategy for informing and involving faculty in the curricular change process. The MORC was distributed electronically to full-time faculty in December 2014 (pre-change), August 2016 (mid-change), and September 2017 (post-change). Respondents reported significantly increasing support and positive attitudes about curricular change, supporting the hypothesis that the communication strategies informed by MORC findings had a positive impact on faculty members' perceptions of the process. As the leading faculty concerns reported in the MORC shifted from the merits of change to practical concerns about implementation, we adapted communications to address their priorities. The MORC proved useful in capturing quantitative data on faculty perceptions of curricular change but its value was limited by low response rates and unrepresentative samples. Scientists, full professors and tenure track faculty members were overrepresented in survey respondents. Survey lengths were identified as limiting participation. Our experience supports the development of a shorter version of MORC to retain validity and reliability while potentially increasing response rate.

Citing Articles

Flipping the expert: faculty educator sensemaking during transition to an active learning-based curriculum.

Brooks J, Hughes D BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):85.

PMID: 38263065 PMC: 10807172. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05039-4.


Change Management in Medical Contexts, especially in Medical Education: A Systematized Review.

Karimi E, Sohrabi Z, Aalaa M J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022; 10(4):219-227.

PMID: 36310665 PMC: 9589067. DOI: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.96519.1704.


Becoming a coach: experiences of faculty educators learning to coach medical students.

Brooks J, Istas K, Barth B BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(1):208.

PMID: 32611343 PMC: 7329385. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02119-z.

References
1.
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta Z, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T . Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010; 376(9756):1923-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5. View

2.
Bland C, Starnaman S, Hembroff L, Perlstadt H, Henry R, Richards R . Leadership behaviors for successful university--community collaborations to change curricula. Acad Med. 1999; 74(11):1227-37. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199911000-00018. View

3.
Loeser H, OSullivan P, Irby D . Leadership lessons from curricular change at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2007; 82(4):324-30. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803337de. View

4.
Bland C, Starnaman S, Harris D, Henry R, Hembroff L . "No fear" curricular change: monitoring curricular change in the W. K. Kellogg Foundation's National Initiative on Community Partnerships and Health Professions Education. Acad Med. 2000; 75(6):623-33. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200006000-00014. View

5.
Skochelak S . A decade of reports calling for change in medical education: what do they say?. Acad Med. 2010; 85(9 Suppl):S26-33. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f1323f. View