» Articles » PMID: 34456841

Hemodynamic Versus Anatomic Assessment of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis: the Relationship Between Pressure Wire Translesional Gradient and Angiographic Lesion Geometry

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Aug 30
PMID 34456841
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intracranial cerebral atherosclerosis (ICAS) is a leading etiology of ischemic stroke. The diagnosis and assessment of intracranial stenosis are shifting from anatomic to hemodynamic for better risk stratification. However, the relationships between lesion geometry and translesional pressure gradient have not been clearly elucidated. Patients with symptomatic unifocal M1 middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) stenosis were consecutively recruited. The translesional pressure gradient was measured with a pressure wire and was recorded as both mean distal/proximal pressure ratios (Pd/Pa) and translesional pressure difference (Pa-Pd). Lesion geometry measured on angiography was recorded as diameter stenosis, minimal lumen diameter, and lesion length. The correlations between pressure-derived and angiography-derived indices were then analyzed. Forty-three patients were analyzed. A negative correlation was found between Pd/Pa and diameter stenosis ( = -0.371; = 0.014) and between Pa - Pd and minimal lumen diameter ( = -0.507; = 0.001). A positive correlation was found between Pd/Pa and minimal lumen diameter ( = 0.411; = 0.006) and between Pa - Pd and diameter stenosis ( = 0.466; = 0.002). In a highly selected ICAS subgroup, geometric indices derived from angiography correlate significantly with translesional pressure gradient indices. However, the correlation strength is weak-to-moderate, which implies that anatomic assessment could only partly reflect hemodynamic status. Translesional pressure gradient measured by pressure wire may serve as a more predictive marker of ICAS severity. More factors need to be identified in further studies.

Citing Articles

Hemodynamic assessment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: comparison between invasive non-hyperemic pressure ratio and angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio.

Wang X, Bian Y, Zhang R, Zhu H, Yang J, Wang R Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1466864.

PMID: 39606702 PMC: 11598932. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1466864.


Hemodynamic Impairments of Evaluating Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis using Quantitative Flow Ratio on Digital Subtraction Angiography : A Comparison with Computed Tomography Perfusion, MRI and Fractional Flow Reserve.

Wu Y, Gao F, Feng H Clin Neuroradiol. 2024; 34(3):613-624.

PMID: 38489035 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-024-01395-2.


Functional evaluation of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis by pressure ratio measurements.

Wang M, Leng X, Mao B, Zou R, Lin D, Gao Y Heliyon. 2023; 9(2):e13527.

PMID: 36852079 PMC: 9958418. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13527.

References
1.
Al-Ali F, Berkhemer O, Yousman W, Elias J, Bender E, Lingsma H . The Capillary Index Score as a Marker of Viable Cerebral Tissue: Proof of Concept-The Capillary Index Score in the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) Trial. Stroke. 2016; 47(9):2286-91. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013513. View

2.
Feng X, Chan K, Lan L, Abrigo J, Ip V, Soo Y . Translesional Pressure Gradient Alters Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis. Stroke. 2020; 51(6):1862-1864. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028616. View

3.
Sacco R, Kargman D, Gu Q, Zamanillo M . Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 1995; 26(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.1.14. View

4.
Zanaty M, Rossen J, Roa J, Nakagawa D, Hudson J, Al Kasab S . Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Disease of Functional, not Anatomic Stenosis? How Trans-Stenotic Pressure Gradients Can Help Guide Treatment. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019; 18(6):599-605. PMC: 7443592. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opz335. View

5.
Pijls N, Bech G, de Bruyne B, van Straten A . Clinical assessment of functional stenosis severity: use of coronary pressure measurements for the decision to bypass a lesion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63(6 Suppl):S6-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00418-9. View